David Myatt
Introduction
The purpose of this work is to present the truth about what is regarded as a modern heresy - to present National-Socialism as it is, and not as it is portrayed by the hostile propaganda of its enemies.
For over half a century, the enemies of National-Socialism - with their almost total control of all the Media [books, television, radio, newspapers, journals and so on]- have pedalled their lies about National-Socialism, its followers and its creator, Adolf Hitler. The opponents of National-Socialism have created an 'official' version of events for the period 1919 to 1945 - and this official version is taught and ceaselessly propagated in all the educational institutions of Western societies. Anyone who deems to contradict or even criticise this version, is deemed an "apologist" for those "crimes" which the official version insists the National-Socialists committed, particularly during the Second World War. Any criticism or contradiction of the official version is officially deemed to be "offensive" and in the majority of Western States, not permitted by Law. In effect, criticism and/or contradiction of the propaganda about National-Socialism is heretical - and those deemed to be modern heretics are regarded as "extremists", vilified, physically attacked, imprisoned, 'persuaded' to recant their heretical views, or killed.
Of course, the majority of the peoples in Western States seldom get to hear about the treatment of these modern heretics - and if they do, the Media makes certain the heretics are portrayed in the worst possible way (as "criminals", "extremists", "mentally unstable" and so on) in consequence of which the majority, believing this propaganda, does not think any more about the matter.
It is matter of grave concern for the future of our civilization that few individuals today seem to actually think for themselves - they accept the 'official' version of the history of the Third Reich as they accept, without question, all the propaganda about National-Socialism and Adolf Hitler. Seldom, if ever, do individuals these days even wonder if what they are taught, in Schools and Universities, if what they read in 'history' books, newspapers or journals, or what they see in 'documentary' films, is actually true. Seldom, if ever, do individuals these days wonder if there is "another side to the story" - a suppressed story. Seldom, if ever, these days do individuals - even those who consider themselves intelligent or 'enlightened' or who espouse 'freedom' - seldom do individuals wonder if they are and have been indoctrinated from an early age: taught to believe an 'official' version, and only that. Sadly, seldom if ever does someone these days have a real desire to discover the truth. It is easier - and safer - to accept things, to not question the 'status quo' that exists regarding the interpretation of National-Socialism. It is easier to pretend - to have an affectation of 'understanding', to regurgitate the propaganda of the past.
Today, in all Western societies, it is fashionable for students, and others, to criticise what they see as the "accepted Order" and its values. What they never criticise - what they are never allowed to criticise - is the official version of the Third Reich and certain events alleged to have taken place during the Second World War.
Because of all this propaganda - because National-Socialism is
a modern heresy - there is one easy way for anyone to discover
the truths mentioned above about there being an 'official'
version of modern history and an official version of
National-Socialism, both of which are not allowed to be
criticised. This easy way to the truth is for them to - in
School, say, or in University, or at work or during their social
life when an opportunity arises - actually try to say that there
may be an alternative view: that perhaps certain events (such as
say, the 'extermination of the Jews' may have been exaggerated or
perhaps be merely War propaganda). Should they actually dare to
say this sort of thing, they can expect a veritable deluge of
condemnation, most of it personal and quite a lot vituperative.
For, they will be told, these things have "been proved,
beyond all possible doubt". Furthermore, should they persist
in saying that perhaps they want to find out, for themselves,
whether these "facts" of history are true or not - then
they will assuredly be told that these 'facts' are true (usually
by people who have never bothered to do any research for
themselves and who merely parrot the 'accepted, official' version
of events) and that the only people who question these
"unassailable" facts of history are "nazis".
It is quite likely that the person who dared to express a
contrary opinion about these "irrefutable" facts of
history - who expresses the merest doubt about what is almost a
religious or sacred dogma - will themselves be condemned as a
"nazi" and told that to express such doubts is
"morally reprehensible", an "insult" or
"evil".
It is to expected that many will not like this present work: it is for those who dare to question, those who do really think and are not prepared to go through their life subtlely and often covertly influenced by clever propaganda. It is a work, written by a modern heretic - a National-Socialist - which presents "the other side of the story".
National-Socialism Revealed
Question:
What is National-Socialism?
Answer:
Basically, National-Socialism is a way of living: a way which expresses, in practical form, the wisdom and insight of thousands of years of civilization. It is a way which is for, and which is applicable to, the Aryan peoples of this world.
National-Socialism asserts that each individual has certain duties and obligations - over and above what today are described as their "rights". Fulfilling these duties and obligations enable not only a healthy life for the individual, but also for the folk community that individual belongs to and and ultimately for the civilization formed from many folk communities. By fulfilling these duties and obligations, the individual elevates their own individual life - that is, they fulfil the potential of existence latent within them: they participate in evolution; they contribute to evolution itself.
Essentially, this way of living is a spiritual one in the sense that it is more noble than the mere pursuit of individual and selfish material 'happiness'. Materialism, in the final analysis, debases and corrupts; National-Socialism exalts the individual by its pursuit of excellence, a pursuit that is both individual and folk-based, and which thus contributes in a positive way to civilization.
The essential features of National-Socialism, insofar as the
individual is concerned, are the concepts of honour,
loyalty and duty. A
National-Socialist strives to be loyal, to do their duty, and to
act honourably.
Question:
Fine sounding words! But as I understand it, Nazism is all
about racial superiority and the hatred that goes with that.
Answer:
Those "fine sounding words" express the reality of National-Socialism - the 'hatred' jibe expresses the propaganda of our opponents. And very successful propaganda it has been and is - since most people believe this falsehood about "racial hatred".
National-Socialism says that this present civilization - which
we shall for convenience and for the moment call 'Western' - is
the almost exclusive creation of Aryan peoples. That is, this
civilization, and the many benefits it has brought, has arisen
because of the talents, the abilities, the creativity, the
sacrifice, the heroism of Aryan peoples. It says the benefits -
present and future - of this civilization belong in the first
instance to those peoples, and then and only then, to other races
external to the civilization. That is, National-Socialism places
Aryan interests first - rather as any normal and honourable
parent often places the welfare of their children before their
own welfare. This is not 'racial hatred' and neither is it
oppression of other races - it is simple common-sense: the
placing of one's own race, and thus kin, before others.
Question:
What do you mean by 'Aryan'? And surely National-Socialism
asserts the superiority of this 'Aryan' race over other races?
Answer:
By Aryan is meant the Caucasian - or White - race; or, if one prefers the older term, "European". And yes - National-Socialism does assert that this race is superior to other races in the ability to create and maintain civilization. If we consider the civilizations so far [ the Sumerian (of which the Egyptian is an offshoot); the Indic; the Sinic; the Hellenic; the Japanese and the Western] then four of these six are the creation of this one race. Furthermore, the creations brought about by the Hellenic and the present Western are vastly in excess of and far outweigh those of the other two civilizations put together. In fact, one could say that the inventions and discoveries of just the Western civilization - exemplified by Science and Technology - far outweigh all civilizations hitherto.
Given this ability to create, to be inventive - and also, be
it noted, be heroic and noble on a large scale over the
course of many centuries - it seems logical and sensible to help
preserve and extend the race that has made all this possible. It
seems illogical, and rather stupid, to try and destroy this
creative race by miscegenation - since evolution (or as I prefer,
the gods) has/have worked over millennia to produce separate
races in the first place and endow them with different
capabilities. Above all, one can say that the Aryan possesses the
capability to create and maintain civilization. Just as some
people these days take pride and satisfaction in helping some
"endangered species", so too do National-Socialists
take pride and satisfaction in helping to preserve their own
race, their own endangered species, the Aryan. One of the best
ways to describe National-Socialism is by the term "racial
ecology".
Question:
But surely, all races have equal ability - it is just the
racism, the hatred and oppression of the Whites over centuries,
that have prevented others from being so creative.
Answer:
As to this "equal ability" of yours - that is just an abstract idea, a dogmatic assumption. The reality - the fact - is that the history of civilizations shows the opposite. Furthermore, it is a scientific fact that it is genetics, and not environment, which determine creativity: that is, ability for the most part lies in the genes. Each individual in a sense is the apex of the pyramid of his or her ancestors. They can extend the capabilities, the creativity, of themselves and their own ancestors - that is, aid evolution, extend themselves upward - by selecting as a mate someone who possesses a similar 'gene pool' in terms of abilities: someone, in short, who belongs to their own folk, their own race. This strengthens the stock - and allows evolution to continue to progress upward. To do otherwise - to choose someone from a different racial stock - is to negate one's own ancestors and evolution itself.
The theory of "Racism" is another abstract idea, another set of dogmatic assumptions. The theory of 'racism' is a projection of something abstract onto reality by the mind of the person who believes in an abstract 'equality' - and the alleged consequences of this theory are things they project onto others, and onto history: things they assume or allege to be fact. One thing assumed or alleged by the proponents of this abstract basically sociological theory, is 'hatred' - that is, someone who believes in racial inequality must 'hate' other races and seek to oppress them. Some proponents go even further and allege that those who believe in racial inequality are somehow "psychologically disturbed" or emotionally "inadequate". Essentially, these assumptions - these projected abstract ideas - curtail genuine understanding and distort reality; they are moralizing prejudices which their proponents seek to inflict upon others, on those who do not agree with their views or interpretations. For what is fundamentally important about the adherents of these abstract ideas is their assumption of a moral 'superiority' - their views, their ideas, their theories, are "correct"; they have 'understanding' and 'intelligence' and are 'enlightened'. Those who do not support these abstract ideas are 'unenlightened', morally reprehensible people - or simply just "unintelligent". Further, facts, evidence, realities, and experiences which do not support these abstract ideas and the assumptions derived from them, are seen by adherents of these sociological theories are either not 'facts', not 'evidence' or irrelevant experiences. Far from being 'enlightened' and rational, the adherents of these abstract ideas have closed minds and a dogmatic adherence to their beliefs.
In reality, National-Socialists - who believe the Aryan race should be preserved because they believe it more capable than other races of creating and maintaining civilization - do not "hate" other races as they do not wish to oppress other races per se. National-Socialism is not the 'politics of racial hate' as adherents of abstract ideas like to believe. National-Socialists simply wish to live among their own kind - as they wish to advance their own people upward: to create better, higher, more noble beings. National-Socialists wish to live in an Aryan culture - to live in communities which express the culture, the spirit, the ethos of the Aryan. And this culture is most certainly not the materialistic, hedonistic, capitalist, selfish rat-race of all present-day 'Western' societies. One of the best ancient examples of Aryan culture was the Athenian polis (or the Greek 'city-State', as it is often known); another was Sparta.
There is no 'racial hatred' here; no so-called "racism", as there is no hatred or oppression implied in the fact that National-Socialists believe the Aryan to be culturally superior. Neither do these things lead to such hatred. They lead only to racial self-determination - freedom for the Aryan peoples of the world: freedom for Aryans to live among their own kind, and to build and maintain their own separate identity.
As to what you said about the White peoples oppressing other
races and keeping them back from developing civilization. While
the civilization of Sumeria was in existence; while the
civilization of Greece and Rome was in existence, while the Indus
civilization arose and flourished, no Aryans oppressed or
suppressed the Blacks in Africa or the Indians in America. Thus,
for about four thousand years at least there was every
opportunity for other races to show some creativity - to produce
great civilizations; to create philosophies, music, art, great
literature. To show nobility. To think. To create a rational
'view of the world'; to devise technologies. What resulted from
these thousands of years? A few scattered fortified remains in
Rhodesia (for which a good case could be made out for being the
creation of Arabs); some religious temples in South America, with
some sort of unaesthetic 'art' and certainly a bloody, repressive
religion. Of course, the adherents of the "all races are
equal" dogma have laboured hard to 'prove' that these and
other such trifles are in fact "civilisation" - but
anyone with any common sense, with any real judgement, can see
the difference. What the adherents of these abstract ideas have
to do - and what they try so hard to do - in order to make what
remains of the 'creations' of other races seem 'civilised', is to
try and undermine standards: of excellence, of achievement, of
discovery, of beauty, of rational thought, of art, of literature
and music. And also of nobility: indeed, of everything really
civilized. In brief, they try to drag everything down to the
lowest level - to 're-write' things like aesthetics so that there
are no high standards; so that there is no such thing as 'good
taste', as 'breeding', as excellence itself. For judged by any
acceptable standard, the creations they are so proud of
triumphing on behalf of other races, are woefully inadequate.
Question:
Let us leave this - for the moment - and return to the
question of hatred. Surely, fascism condones racial hatred? Or,
perhaps I should say, surely a Nazi by definition espouses the
politics of race hate?
Answer:
First, I should point out that fascism and National-Socialism are entirely different. Fascism is basically only a political belief or point of view - a desire for a strong, corporate State, and leadership. National-Socialism is a way of living and an acceptance of the racial realities of the world.
Secondly - in reality, the "politics of race hate"
is a meaningless term of abuse. National-Socialism is primarily
concerned with the Aryan: with building communities where Aryans
can be free, and express their own, unique cultural identity. The
question of 'hating' other races or individuals of other races
does not enter into it. In fact, there is toleration of racial
differences. What National-Socialism does say, is that we as
Aryans can only be healthy and in harmony with our culture, with
our unique soul - we can only fully prosper spiritually - when
the lands in which we have or establish our communities contain
our folk and only our folk. Anything other than this is
unsatisfactory - a temporary compromise full of problems for the
different races involved. That is, National-Socialism believes in
the total separation of the races - not one race being 'master'
over others, or keeping others as slaves or whatever.
National-Socialism accepts that racial intermingling in the same
territory or territories - whether or not this means or implies
one 'dominant' race and one 'subservient' race, or whether it
means or implies a racial intermixing through miscegenation - is
undesirable and has, and assuredly will, create great
difficulties and strife for all the races involved. This is a
fact of life and history - a hard lesson which we, as
National-Socialists, have learned. Due to the differing abilities
of races, there will always be strife and conflict by virtue of
the fact that the less well-endowed, the less prosperous, the
less creative race, will always envy and seek to possess what a
more creative or industrious or self-sacrificing race has created
for itself. The differences of millennia of evolution cannot be
wiped out by any programmes of 'education', by any sentimental
attempts to 're-dress the balance of Nature' via social and
political schemes. What all these things will do and can only do
is favour the "incomers" at the expense of the
indigenous - and this will lead to resentment and anger by the
indigenous peoples. This the adherents of the abstract ideas will
try to curb via Laws - by legislation and by social and political
policies which are more and more repressive against the
indigenous majority. In short, a tyrannical system will be
created which seeks to do the impossible - change the laws and
processes of Nature. The result can only be more strife, more
conflict - and chaos; the downfall of civilization itself.
Question:
But surely National-Socialism means genocide - the destruction
of other races, treating them as 'sub-human'?
Answer:
That is a lie ceaselessly propagated by our enemies. Let us assume there is a National-Socialist State: what other races may or may not do, within their own countries, would be of no concern to us as National-Socialists - provided that they did not attack us, of course. We would seek to live our lives in our own way - continue with building and extending our civilization, with taking evolution ever higher by creating better, more noble ways of living and consequently better human beings. We would not seek conflict - but would prepare for it. We would not seek to master the world and all its peoples - that would be an intolerable and unnecessary burden! We would seek space or territory only sufficient for our needs - what else might be needed (raw materials, say) would be obtained in a civilized way: via trade, negotiation.
What would be essential would be to maintain our territory as ours - to restrict access to other races (rather like feudal Japan or the Greek polis restricted the entry and privileges of aliens: and what noble cultures both were!). There would be, I repeat, no 'colonial' adventures, no 'racial imperialism': such things are counter-productive in the end.
As to treating other races as 'sub-human' - if they treated us with respect, they would be treated with respect. There would be no disdain for them - no ill feelings; merely an acceptance of differences. And certainly not any interference in their affairs: no attempt to patronize them, to "civilize" them.
Question:
All this sounds very fine - but I cannot believe you are
talking about National-Socialism!
Answer:
All these things are fine - and express genuine National-Socialism - because they are based on those qualities I mentioned right at the very beginning. In particular, they express nobility of character and personal honour. What must be remembered is that National-Socialism is a conscious expression of the natural, higher, instincts and aspirations of those of Aryan race. It expresses civilized notions - it expresses civilized conduct.
Of course, most people do not associate these things with National-Socialism - with Hitler or the Third Reich - because of the successful, lying propaganda campaigns by our enemies over the past seventy years or so. But they are the facts - they express the reality, the truths of National-Socialism as it really is. For instance, it is true to say that National-Socialism today, and only National-Socialism, expresses all the virtues that have not only made our past and present civilizations possible, but also enabled those civilizations to survive and flourish and thus contribute to evolution.
I shall explain what National-Socialism actually is in a way which is not open to mis-interpretation. The real aim of National-Socialism is to express in a practical way the numinous quality of the Aryan soul - to make real, to the folk at large, the beauty, the goodness, the nobility, the dreams and aspirations which we Aryans hold in our hearts. National-Socialism aims to make these noble feelings, these noble aspirations, real through folk communities - through the structures of a New Order founded on idealism.
An example will make this clear. There is a sublime beauty, for instance, in a lot of Classical music - for this music, at its best, captures and expresses the Aryan soul. Such music can move us - it can make us aware of what is beyond us as individuals. It transports us to a sublime realm - and one thinks here of J.S. Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert ... In effect, such music (and indeed all great art and literature) is civilizing. National-Socialism can make this noble, this aesthetic civilizing experience, real for the majority of Aryans: not for a select 'cultured' few, but for everyone. This is so because National-Socialism in its aims and idealism captures the sublime beauty that such an aesthetic experience represents - and because National-Socialism is based upon reality, upon what works: it is in harmony with (or rather expresses the harmony of) Nature.
National-Socialism uplifts and ennobles - it aims to transform
individuals, to raise them up to a higher level, to let them
participate in a higher, more noble way of life; and it does this
in a practical way by creating communities and structures - a New
Order - which embody its noble, uplifting, idealistic principles.
Question:
But the reality of National-Socialism - as shown by the Third
Reich - is different. There we have brutality, tyranny - and the
extermination of the Jews. Hardly noble idealism!
Answer:
The reality of National-Socialism, in the past, is not different. The 'brutality', the 'tyranny', the genocide which you and others focus on are myths, lies - the propaganda creations of our opponents.
What I have expressed about beauty, about noble aspirations, represents the truth about National-Socialism - a truth suppressed for over fifty years. And it was because National-Socialism, and Adolf Hitler, embodied such noble idealism that the Germans fought so hard and with such heroism during the Second World War. They knew or felt what they were fighting for: something worthwhile, something cultured, something civilized. Those who fought against them - and who unfortunately won - were fighting for what we have today, in all the societies of the West: uncivilized behaviour (as evident in rampant crime and social decay), drugs, pornography, selfish hedonism. The German National-Socialists, and the many European volunteers who fought with them in the Waffen-SS, fought heroically and died to defend European civilization itself. Their opponents fought and died to bring about the social conditions we have today - multi-culturism, decadence, consumer materialism, the mindless cacophony of modern "pop" music. It really is as simple as that.
Question:
You say the brutality, the tyranny, the genocide are
propaganda myths - but there is ample historical and documentary
evidence to prove otherwise.
Answer:
There is ample propaganda which attempts to prove such assertions. Let us first take this mantically repeated assertion that National-Socialist Germany exterminated so many millions of Jews.
There is ample documentary and scientific evidence to prove that such exterminations, in so-called 'gas-chambers', never took place and were, in fact, as described by 'survivors', scientifically impossible. That is, that what were described as 'gas-chambers' for mass exterminations at such places as Auschwitz, could not have been used for such purposes in the manner described by 'survivors' and others - using Zyklon B. The remains of these so-called 'gas chambers' have been scientifically examined, the effects of Zyklon B studied, and the results show beyond doubt that such exterminations, in the manner described in all 'history' books, in all 'survivors' accounts, in all other testimony, were scientifically impossible. [ I refer you here to "The Leuchter Report", and Butz's "Hoax of the Twentieth Century".]
There is no escaping from this. Either the majority of Jews were exterminated in the manner which has, since 1945, been systematically claimed - in 'gas chambers' using Zyklon B - or they were not. If scientific and other evidence clearly shows that this is impossible - then obviously they were not so exterminated in the manner claimed. The evidence shows that such exterminations, in the manner described repeatedly since 1945, were impossible.
This raises interesting and serious questions. Clearly, there has been a lot of lying, a lot of propaganda - and, in fact, a conspiracy to promote that propaganda and silence critics of it. The fact that the 'holocaust' is propaganda is now proved - to anyone who seriously studies it and thinks clearly and logically about this 'holocaust'. For the 'gas chamber' scenario - using Zyklon B - is central to this 'holocaust' story: critical examination of the other parts of this story, reveals it to be a story, and a fictional one at that. [See, for example, Butz's book mentioned above; "Did Six Million Really Die?", edited by Barbara Kulaszka; Carlos Porter - "Not Guilty at Nuremberg"; Paul Rassinier - "Holocaust Story and the Lies of Ulysses"; Joseph Harlow - "Innocent in Dachau".]
What applies to the 'holocaust' applies to the alleged brutality and tyranny of National-Socialist Germany - and also to the myth that Hitler wanted to 'rule the world' and started the Second World War to begin his quest. All these are myths - deliberate lies, ceaselessly repeated. The 'evidence' for each and every one of them can be disproved - for instance, the assertion that Hitler started the Second World War has been comprehensively and scholarly refuted in "The Forced War" by David L. Hoggan. The reality of National-Socialist Germany was vastly different from how it has been portrayed by the Allied 'victors' and their tame, court 'historians'.One thinks here, for instance, of an objective account such as the one written by a British journalist, H. Powys Greenwood - "The German Revolution" - published in 1934.
Of course, not many will have heard of these works - and the
many others like them which effectively demolish or show that the
'accepted' version of what happened in National-Socialist Germany
and during the Second World War, is a lie. This in itself is not
surprising. The 'powers that be' in the Western world have a
vested interest in perpetuating the myths and lies - and in
making those books and sources which refute these myths and lies
not only difficult to obtain but also seem to be 'unscholarly' or
merely 'neo-nazi propaganda'. The fact that the 'official'
version of events - which includes the 'holocaust' story - is a
lie can be shown by the fact that no Western academic Institution
allows or encourages any form of historical research which might
contradict the 'official' version. Any other research into any
other period of history is permitted and encouraged. There are
many instances of respected teachers and academics - up to and
including History Professors - who once they challenge the
'official' version of history are put under severe pressure to
'recant' what amounts to heretical views; and if they fail to
recant - if they fail to 'toe the line' - they are intimidated
and ultimately forced by the Establishment to resign. For the
Establishment will not tolerate anyone in a position of influence
and authority propounding heretical views - that is,
contradicting the myths and lies about National-Socialist Germany
and the Second World War.
Question:
If these things are indeed all myths and lies, then it implies
that there must have been, and is, some sort of conspiracy to
create and perpetuate these. This surely is getting into the
realms of paranoia.
Answer:
Correctly used - rather than a term of abuse - the word 'paranoia' means either a tendency to suspect or distrust others, or a mental illness whose symptoms include delusions of persecution. Neither of these apply in this instance.
There has been, and indeed is, a conspiracy - that is, a group of people acting together for a specific, covert, purpose: which I believe you will find is the definition of the word 'conspiracy'. The purpose of this group of people - in the specific instance of National-Socialism - was to discredit it and ultimately destroy it. To this end, lies and myths were invented and circulated, and atrocity propaganda produced. As to the reason for this - that is quite simple. National-Socialism, as exemplified by Adolf Hitler and National-Socialist Germany, was seen as a threat to this group of people - to their aims and plans. So this group of people used all their power and influence (which at that time was considerable within the societies of the West) to deal with this threat.
The aims and plans of this group were essentially two-fold. First, to advance within Western nations various causes - chief among which was Marxism and the various sociological/social theories deriving from it - for the purpose of subverting the States and people of the West, enabling this conspiratorial group to increase their power and influence. Second, having thus gained more influence and power (covert power, of course - part of which is control of finance, or 'money'), to use that power and influence to establish for themselves and others like them a land or country of their own which would enable them to prosper and be in a position to implement the final part of their plan. This final part is the establishment of some kind of "messianic kingdom" which would eventually rule all other peoples.
All this is easy to understand - it is a struggle for power by a group of people dedicated to their own aims and plans. But it is not an overt or obvious struggle for power - it is hidden, concealed and thus conspiratorial. It has also been a concerted struggle over many decades - one imbued with a religious fervour at times bordering on the zealous and deriving from a messianic belief in being "chosen". Furthermore, it has been a brutal struggle wherein the conspirators have been, and are, prepared to use all and every means - however ignoble, brutal, treacherous and cowardly - to achieve their aims.
It should be obvious that this group of people are 'Zionists'. To them, National-Socialism was a direct and serious threat - because Adolf Hitler explained to the German people (and Aryans in general) just what was happening and what the consequences of Zionist success would be: the downfall of our present civilization. He also explained how the Zionists used things like Marxism to undermine Aryan peoples - to divide them, to control them and to force them to live in a totally un-Aryan, unhealthy, way. He understood, and explained, Marxism and its kindred causes, as a sickness which would weaken Aryan peoples and which would eventually lead to their extinction through miscegenation. But he also - and perhaps most significantly - led his followers to power and began to construct a genuine Aryan State founded on Aryan principles and dedicated to giving practical form to the Aryan soul or collective psyche. He also foresaw a practical solution to the Zionist problem - give them land, and let them establish themselves, and not interfere with his own people. This would have been an equatable solution. But the messianic Zionists, in their zeal and with a hatred of this Aryan resurgence in Germany, did not want this. Adolf Hitler and his National-Socialists had challenged them - and they were determined to destroy him and National-Socialism. So a war was agitated for - openly and covertly - from the time Adolf Hitler achieved power in 1933. A lying propaganda campaign was begun - and Adolf Hitler and National-Socialist Germany cast as the "enemies of civilisation", as "evil" and so on. The Zionists used all their covert power and influence to bring National-Socialist Germany into disrepute and to agitate for war - a war to "defend freedom/democracy" and so on, whereas in fact they meant "defend us and our secret messianic hopes".
After six years, their campaign was successful. The war
enabled the Zionists to increase their power and influence - to
further their plans. With the defeat of Germany - by fellow
Aryans using the resources of their Aryan nations and
civilization on behalf of the Zionists - the Zionists were able
to begin to establish their own State: and it is no coincidence
that the State of Israel was created shortly after the end of the
Second World War. The Zionists had seized their chance - and
created a deluge of atrocity propaganda. The fiction of the
'holocaust' had been born - and it served the Zionists well. It
enabled a vengeful and ignoble persecution of National-Socialists
after the war (of which the farcical and unjust Nuremberg trials
were but part); it justified the war itself and the call for
'unconditional surrender'; it enabled the governments and people
of the West to be morally blackmailed into supporting the
creation of the State of Israel by dispossessing the
Palestinians; it caused the 'West' to turn a blind eye to Zionist
atrocities against Palestinians - and it also discredited
National-Socialism and Adolf Hitler in the eyes of most Aryans.
It also, not insignificantly, enabled the new settlers of this
new State to claim millions and millions of pounds in
'compensation' from Germany, and receive massive aid and almost gratis
loans from Western countries, principally America.
All the problems which beset the countries of the West - racial conflict, crime, drugs, moral degeneracy, selfish hedonism and so on - are the direct consequences of National-Socialism being defeated in the Second World War. Since this defeat, there have been silent revolutions in all Western States - the implementation of Marxist doctrines by stealth, by means of 'social engineering'. The ideals of Western civilization - heroism, pursuit of excellence, honour, duty, loyalty to one's folk, racial pride - have almost disappeared, replaced by an abstract 'multi-culturism' and consumer materialism. Miscegenation is occurring on a wide scale - and there is, for the majority of Aryans, no evidence of an Aryan culture for Aryans to identify with, be proud of, to uphold, extend and draw strength from: they are presented with only the degeneracy of modern 'art', modern 'literature', modern 'music' and modern ways of urban living.
All this has been foreseen - for it is the inevitable consequence of increasing Zionist power and influence. For the fulfilment of their messianic hopes, they need docile, identity-less, unproud, degenerate, racially-unaware, selfish, hedonistic peoples unaware of the forces influencing and controlling them. Such peoples are chattel - merely a means to a Zionist end.
Adolf Hitler had the genius to foresee all this - and offer a practical alternative. He created National-Socialism and by his courage, leadership and will, led his followers to victory - thus showing all Aryans the way to salvation. He created a practical expression of our racial soul - something which would enable us to fulfil our purpose in life. One might say - with justification - that Adolf Hitler expressed the will of our gods, of a divine Providence: for National-Socialism embodies everything that is vital to not only this present civilization, but civilizations in general. It embodies everything that for us Aryans is noble and numinous.
He gave us back our real heritage - our Destiny.
Question:
What you say almost amounts to an adulation of Hitler - an
idolization of him.
Answer:
Certainly. For us, as National-Socialists, Adolf Hitler is the greatest person of our time - perhaps of all time. He is our inspiration. He and he alone gave us an awareness of what we are and what we can be. He made us aware of our unique Destiny, our civilizing mission - and he gave us, in National-Socialism, the practical means to make that Destiny real, to fulfill it and so contribute to evolution. His importance cannot be overestimated.
He was one of those rare individuals who occur perhaps once every millennia - one in whom there is combined the qualities and genius of a great leader, a great philosopher(1) and a great teacher. He possessed real charisma - and through his own abilities and will, he achieved power and success. The vast majority of the German people came to respect and love him - quite simply because they knew or felt he was a noble, good, person who cared for them and who had struggled to achieve things for them, and not himself. He was modest in his personal life, even when he had achieved power: he was always spontaneous and natural with others, totally unpretentious. He inspired loyalty and love in those who knew him.
Because what he stood for and what he achieved was a threat to
that particular group of conspirators mentioned previously, they
needed to try and discredit him - and destroy him. But while he
may be dead in body, his spirit lives on in his followers - and
always will live on - just as he will always be remembered as he
really was by those who know, who are in touch with their own psyche,
their own racial soul. The lies, the myths, the propaganda about
him are really irrelevant in the long term - for our gods loved
him and aided him and will see that he, and his followers, are
triumphant in the end.
Question:
This makes National-Socialism sound almost like a new
religion. And what do you mean by "our gods"?
Answer:
By creating National-Socialism and by leading his followers to victory, Adolf Hitler gave us, as Aryans, the beliefs, symbols, forms and martyrs which, at this moment in our history as a race, we need to re-affirm our unique identity - which we need to achieve that Destiny which he has bequeathed us.
National-Socialism can guide us as Aryans to a healthy, more spiritual, way of being - a way in which we can actively participate in evolution itself and so give meaning to our own life as individuals. That is, it enables us to fulfill the purpose of our existence. National-Socialism is profoundly spiritual - although by 'spiritual' I do not mean the type of spirituality associated with that life-denying, anti-evolutionary, moralizing religion called Christianity. Rather, I mean spiritual in the sense of pertaining to the soul - to the psyche: to what is beyond us, as individuals. Christianity is a complete negation of our unique racial soul - a soul expressed, for instance (albeit in an instinctive way) by the pagan religions of Northern Europe, and also (perhaps in a somewhat more conscious way) by the ancient Greeks, who were our racial kinfolk.
National-Socialism gives practical expression to this soul - and this expression is both conscious, and numinous. It is, in a very important sense, a spirituality appropriate for the 21st Century and beyond - something living, as the religions of our ancestors are not living. It is a conscious expression because it gives us an awareness and a Destiny - we are aware of our unique identity as Aryans, of our past achievements and future possibilities; and it is our Destiny to realize the potential that is latent within us - to take ourselves and our race and thus evolution ever higher and further by our heroism, our nobility, our exploration, our conquest, our pursuit of excellence. It is a numinous expression because it is possessed of awe and splendour: both in the aesthetic sense (of representing - or "re-presenting" in the sense of the Heidegger - what is beautiful and noble) and also in the sense of revealing to us, through the sacrifice of the many martyrs who died for the Cause and the heroism of those who have fought for it, the gods themselves.
I say "the gods" quite deliberately. They are those beings, both male and female, who express or are concerned with, the workings of Nature. In an intellectual sense, they are the personifications of the forces, laws or processes of Nature - of those powers, or forces, which are beyond us as individuals and which we can never hope to control, to bend to our individual will. Of course, today it is fashionable to see these gods as merely personifications - as not really existing, in themselves. But this is dangerous because it is facile - an arrogance, a pretentiousness. 'Personifications' cannot cause retribution, they cannot decide one's fate - they cannot choose to favour some and destroy others. So the 'intellectual' feels safe, secure - because by and large they have never in their intellectual, facile, usually materially secure and often urbanized lives, faced or experienced the realness, the awe, the primal splendour of those powers. In short, such people have or show no reverence or respect for those things which are supra-personal or divine or 'sacred' - because, quite simply, such people are vainly arrogant, existing on the surface of life: only half-alive (quite often, not even half-alive!). In summary, such people epitomize modern decadence.
Individuals of real experience, of real wisdom, who are still - despite the vile decadence of the modern world - in touch with their racial instincts, know what is meant by 'the gods'. These deities do not require names - or pompous rites, nor even religious observance. They just are, and are accorded a respect which is often wordless. They are felt, rather than spoken about - just as they are known to be present in or to visit, certain 'sacred' places or areas; places or areas which accordingly are treated with respect: places, for example, like mountains, groves, springs, forests, or even individual trees. But perhaps most importantly, these gods are manifest in folk-communities: in communities, bound by ties of blood, which seek to represent the beauty and nobility, the excellence, the war-like spirit, that these gods represent.There is, by individuals who accept such gods, an acceptance that a certain harmony, a certain respect, is necessary for a healthy and prosperous life; that there are limits to personal and communal behaviour - and that what goes beyond these limits is disrespectful of the gods and invites misfortune, for the community and the individual.
National-Socialism returns us to this spiritual way of being because it is founded on the wisdom of centuries - on an understanding of the relationship between the individual, the community, the race and what is beyond all these, the gods or 'Nature'. In National-Socialism there is respect for the laws and processes of Nature, or the gods - as is most clearly evident in the understanding that Nature, or the gods, have produced over many thousands of millennia, the different races on this planet and endowed them with different abilities: to the Aryan has been given the gifts of creativity and nobility. National-Socialism asserts that it is dis-respectful to ignore these laws and processes of Nature, or the gods, and that ultimately this dis-respect will be paid for - to dis-respect one's folk and race by miscegenation is to act against Nature, or the gods, and this will assuredly result in a retribution: the downfall of the race, misfortune for individuals, and not only the destruction of an existing civilization, but all future civilizations because the creative race that might create them has become extinct. Of course, an individual - undertaking something disrespectful to the gods, like miscegenation - may not personally, in their own life, feel the retribution of those gods (although often this will happen). Sometimes, this retribution - which will inevitably come - is reserved for their descendants: by their act or acts of dis-respect the individual has placed what amounts to a curse upon his or her descendants, and their lives will assuredly be full of misfortune. Thus, in a way most people have forgotten, dis-respect to the gods is a supremely selfish act.
The spirituality of National-Socialism is also expressed by the duties and obligations National-Socialism imposes upon the individual - or rather, which the individual accepts because they accept the fundamental truths represented by National-Socialism. There is a duty to keep the race pure, to extend the race upward through the personal pursuit of excellence; there is an obligation to act honourably and nobly and to respect what is noble and sacred. These things - and the many others associated with National-Socialism - mean that the individual National-Socialist, and by extension their communities, are vital and healthy: they express a joy in living, a strength of personal character. They are healthy, inspiring specimens - the best of our race. This can be seen in National-Socialist Germany, particularly among the young - look at the faces of the young in the film "The Triumph of the Will", for instance, or look at the many photographs taken during the years 1933 to 1939 by Heinrich Hoffmann; and then contrast them with what you see today, in any Western country. Anyone possessed of any noble feeling - any insight or even a modicum of common-sense - will see the difference.
National-Socialist Germany was the type of society the ancient
Greeks and Romans would have admired - and it was the type of
society that all decent Aryans yearn for in their hearts. That
the majority today do not understand this - that most non-German
Aryans failed to understand it at the time - is due to the lies
and atrocity propaganda of a conspiratorial cabal aided and
abetted by renegade Aryans either intent on their own self-gain
or indoctrinated by the Marxist doctrines that those of the cabal
created to further their sinister messianic aims. But as the
decadent System created within the West by those conspirators
begins to fall-apart, more and more Aryans will come to realize
the truth and see Adolf Hitler and his National-Socialism for
what they really are: their salvation, and the salvation of
civilization itself.
Question:
Do you therefore see National-Socialism as some sort of new
religion, capable of sweeping aside the old order through some
sort of 'holy war'?
Answer:
It is religious in the sense that we honour Adolf Hitler, celebrate his birthday, his triumph in achieving power, and various other dates throughout the year which are important to us because they recall the sacrifices others (such as Rudolf Hess) have made for the Cause. It is religious in the sense that we have a faith in our Destiny, in our mission, and believe we are acting in accord with the will of our gods. It is religious in the sense that we honour the symbols of our Cause, like the Swastika. It is religious in that we have great respect and admiration for those who fought and in many cases died because they were loyal to Adolf Hitler. It is religious in the sense that we revere certain places connected with Adolf Hitler, his struggle for power.
But it is not religious in the conventional sense of having "priests", rigid "rituals" and things like "prayers". Such things are the trappings of anti-evolutionary religions dedicated to a rather selfish and personal "salvation". We as National-Socialists are concerned with the salvation of our race first - with fighting honourably for our Cause. For thereby we gain glory, fame and fulfil our personal existence. This is the Aryan way, as the Christian way (and those of Eastern religions) is not Aryan. We live in our achievements, through our heroism, through our glory - and not in some mythical "after-life".
As to a 'holy war' - in many ways, that is what is happening. Our opponents fear our spirituality; which is why they have, since 1945, tried to destroy and obliterate the symbols of our success or those places connected with the struggle. Consider, for instance, what happened after the death [many would say after the murder] of Rudolf Hess - he who was honourably loyal to Adolf Hitler throughout his inhuman forty-seven years of imprisonment. The place where he spent most of that imprisonment was blown-up immediately after his death, and all traces destroyed or remained. Another building (perhaps fittingly for the decadent System, a palace of consumer-materialism) was hastily erected on the site. All this, the authorities said, to prevent the place becoming "a shrine" (their word). One of the many other places destroyed was Adolf Hitler's home, the 'Berghof', and for the same reason, as far back as 1945. Quite recently, when someone erected a memorial in the field in Scotland where Rudolf Hess landed in 1941 in an attempt to bring the fratricidal war to an end, it was destroyed within days by zealous unthinking guardians of the ways of those conspirators responsible for that war - lest, it was said yet again, it became a place of "pilgrimage" for National-Socialists.
Even before the immolation of 1945, our struggle had been, fundamentally, a spiritual one against the forces of ruin. But it has only been since then - after what seemed at the time a catastrophic event - that the spiritual nature of our struggle was appreciated by most of those involved. Before then, it seemed to some - even to some of those Germans who fought - a struggle between nation-states. But that was only appearance. On the one side were the forces representing civilized values and virtues, a noble, Aryan way of living - on the other side were the forces representing abstract, dogmatic ideas and a dark messianic dream. Our struggle was always in the nature of a holy one - but now we are fully aware of it, as our enemies are. Hence their brutal terror against us and against those who have seen through their lies and propaganda. Hence their turning to 'Law' to outlaw us and make our views heretical and imprison those who espouse them. Hence, also, their fear: in some ways, through their terror, their fratricidal war, their suppression, they have given us the weapon we need to defeat them - a religious fervour which no amount of persecution can destroy. The harder they persecute us, the stronger we become.
With this weapon, we can make real the 'Thousand Year Reich',
and create a new civilization to seed our race across the
stars-systems of our galaxy.
1. In the real sense of that term - someone who propounds wisdom.