Disinformation and Combat 18:

A few years ago, the founder and leader of Combat 18, Charlie Sargent, was sentenced to life imprisonment for murder. There were several interesting things about his trial and the publicity which followed.

The publicity was, of course, all negative and most of it written by or (in the case of television programmes) produced by dedicated enemies of National-Socialism. Even the few articles which were not written by Zionists or Zionist sympathisers used the biased information supplied by Zionist organizations such as the notorious Searchlies organization (aka Searchlight).

One instance of note was a television programme (World in Action) whose information was almost entirely obtained from Searchlies: not surprising considering the Associate Producer of the programme was an Editor for the Searchlies magazine. This programme, like some newspaper articles, suggested that Charlie was a paid informer for the Police and MI5.

No real evidence was produced - just rumour, hearsay and speculation.

The result of this smear, this campaign of disinformation, was exactly what the Zionists intended: to undermine and hopefully destroy the credibility of Charlie in the eyes of the so-called "Right-wing".

And they succeeded in doing this, all on the basis of no evidence whatsoever, and on the basis that few people - certainly not those in the BNP who repeated and elaborated upon the Zionist rumours and disinformation - had the decency, the HONOUR, the contact Charlie and ask for his side of the story.

Thus, we had the spectacle of people like Nick Griffin from the BNP saying and writing that programmes like World in Action [ that is, Searchlies] and articles by Zionists and Zionist sympathisers in national newspapers, "proved" that Charlie was an informer for the State, without this Griffin person once having the decency, the honour, the contact Charlie, or those still loyal to Charlie, to ask for his side of the story. Not only does this Griffin person lack the Aryan character to ask this, but he also accepts rumours, lies, allegations and hearsay as evidence, and uses the information processed and presented by the Media despite his past belief and rhetoric that such Media is a tool of those forces which control the State.

That is, this person - and many others like him - dismiss the Media and what its says, reports and writes, when it suits them, and accept what the Media says, reports and writes when its suits them. That is, their basis for judgement about a person is most certainly not personal honour, but rather so-called "unbiased", "factual" information, transmitted, supplied and/or manufactured as this information is by either their enemies, or by other people who also do not use personal honour as the sole basis for their personal judgement.

What is particularly important here - from the viewpoint of honour, of Aryan behaviour, of NS belief - is that few of even Charlie's former comrades had the decency, the honour, to ask Charlie: they just believed the Zionist disinformation and (worse) added to it by spreading even more rumours, more hearsay, more allegations.

So it was that so-called Right-wing activists, so-called "National Socialists" in this and other countries, were shown for what they were: lacking in honour, and unable or unwilling to think and act like true ARYANS. These people accepted Zionist lies and disinformation as truth without having the honour to ask for Charlie's side of the story.

Just like most other Aryans, they had shown themselves to be susceptible to Zionists manipulation because they did not live by, did not act upon, their own Aryan values of honour, loyalty and duty.

The Zionist campaign also had two other effects, as the Zionists intended. The first was to isolate Charlie: not only had he to serve a long term of imprisonment in a Zionist-controlled prison, but he had little or no support from Comrades, from fellow Aryan activists. Thus his NS deeds would be ignored, or forgotten, with he himself certainly not regarded as some kind of NS hero: as a political prisoner.

The second effect was to send a message to those few who did understand what the Zionists were doing. What they trying to do was to show what would happen to those who dared to act: who dared to do something practical about ZOG. The Zionists were saying: "We have the power, the influence, to destroy your credibility so that your deeds will not be understood, with your yourself either forgotten or regarded as a traitor; we will allow you no glory; we will not allow you to be regarded as a hero, as some kind of martyr."

So it is that the Zionists have used the power of the Media - which they control or can influence - to spread rumours, lies and disinformation about National-Socialists, as they know they can rely upon the majority of so-called "National Socialists" in this and other countries to think and behave in an un-Aryan way and believe these rumours, lies and disinformation.

As someone once said: repeat a lie often enough and for long enough and most people will come to believe it is true. This is exactly what has happened with Charlie: it has now come to be accepted in so-called "nationalist" and "National Socialist" circles that Charlie was an informer, which is a dreadful indictment on the people in these circles for their lack of Aryan behaviour.

I repeat here the truth, optimistically believing as I do that there is still hope for our people: still time for them to return to the Aryan way of thinking and acting. The truth is that there is no evidence whatsoever that Charlie was an informer; that he conspired to kill Chris Castle; that he stole any of the funds Combat 18 raised from the sale of music CD's. All there are and have been are rumours, allegations, and Zionist disinformation.

There is, however, evidence to show that for many years he actively tried to do something practical about ZOG and created and led an organization that caused outright dread and fear to ZOG: so much so that they decided they had to mobilise and use all the resources at their disposal, from MI5, to the Police, to the Media, to disrupt and destroy Combat 18. There is evidence to show that two former comrades of Charlie actively co-operated with the State, before and during Charlie's trial, by giving evidence against him in a Court of Law, even though these so-called comrades were supposed to view such Courts of Law, and the Police themselves, as tools of the Zionist System they were supposed to be fighting.

There is evidence to show that the Zionists succeeded in breaking Combat 18 into two fueding groups: in creating bad blood between fellow National-Socialists, once again showing how successful the policy of "divide and conquer" is.

The Most Important Thing:

The most important thing about all this is that it is NOT "evidence" which matters: it is a person's word, given on their honour.

The Aryan thing to do is to ask a person about matters, and if they give their word, on their honour, then their word of honour is accepted.

The most important thing is personal honour: not so-called "factual evidence"; not so-called procedures in a Court of Law; not so-called "information" published in a newspaper or elsewhere.

The whole Zionist System - our Zionist Occupation Government - is built upon making so-called abstract "evidence" and "information" the basis for personal judgement. Thus can the Zionists - and thus do the Zionists - destroy a person's reputation through the use of the Media, through the use of disinformation.

Our Aryan character, and our our Aryan culture and Aryan law, on the other hand, are built upon personal honour. That is, we Aryans make our judgements about a person on the basis of personal honour: on personally knowing an individual, and accepting their word of honour.

The Aryan thing to do is to ask an individual, in person, about any and all rumours and allegations. And if for some reason you cannot ask that individual in person, you dismiss any and all evidence, any and all rumours and accusations made against them by anyone, anywhere. That is, you give that person the benefit of the doubt, and most certainly do not repeat any rumours, or allegations, about that person, or even discuss that person, with someone else, in their absence: that is, the Aryan thing to do is not talk about someone "behind their back".

To talk about someone behind their back is un-Aryan behaviour; it is dishonourable: the sign of a weak character, of a lack of self-discipline.

This is how the matter really stands. To win the war we are engaged in, we must think, and act, like Aryans, making personal honour our guiding principle, and indeed the basis for accepting whether or not someone actually is a National-Socialist or not.

Those who show by their personal behaviour - by their words and deeds - that they lack personal honour, that they lack an Aryan character, cannot and will not be considered as National-Socialists.

Disinformation and David Copeland:

That the above analysis is correct is proved by the case of David Copeland.

What happened to Charlie, happened to David Copeland. Here was someone who tried to do something against ZOG, whether or not we personally agree with the tactics he used. And here is someone who has been accused of either being an agent for the State, or an unwitting pawn used by the State, and whose personal character the Zionist information machine has saught to undermine and destroy.

Thus, so-called "nationalists" and so-called "National Socialists" have gone around repeating the rumours, the Zionist dis-information, that the London nail-bombs were either a plot by the State to discredit the so-called "Right-wing" movement in Britain, or the work of a mentally unstable individual. That is, his actions - and the person himself - can be dismissed, and forgotten about.

Once again, the credibility of someone who acted against ZOG is destroyed. And on the basis of what? On the basis of rumours, allegations, dis-information and so-called "experts" in subjects like psychology and psychiatry. Once again, a person who acted is judged by people supposedly "on our side" according to the standards, the methods, of the Zionists - and not on the basis of personal honour.

Once again, our Aryan way of doing things, of judging someone, is ignored. Who has spoken, in person, to David Copeland and asked him for his side of the story? Who has refrained from making any negative comment about him, and his actions, thus giving him the benefit of the doubt?

Who is actively supporting him, and who is contradicting the lies, the dis-information, put out by the Zionists about his character? [Mention might be made here of the Searchlies book about him entitled "Mr Evil".]

Who is acting in an Aryan way, in this matter, and who is actively supporting the Zionists, and their government of occupation, by acting in an un-Aryan way: by repeating their lies, rumours and dis-information?

A Personal Comment:

It is possible, as a result of my efforts to promote National-Socialism, that in the near future I will find myself in a Court of Law charged with transgressing some Zionist law or other.

It is also possible that I may be found guilty on the basis of so-called "evidence" and sent to prison. It is also possible, and indeed highly likely, that the Zionist dis-information machine will be brought into action and directed at me personally in an attempt to destroy my credibility and call into question my beliefs and actions.

No doubt the old, now familiar, rumours about me, tirelessly repeated by Searchlies over the past decade, will be repeated yet again. And no doubt even more rumours, more allegations, will be manufactured by the Zionists in an attempt to discredit me.

What will you do? What will other National-Socialists and "nationalists" do on hearing or reading such rumours, allegations and dis-information?

Accept them, and repeat them to others? Maybe even write an article or two about me, based on such Zionist disinformation? Talk about me "behind my back"?

Or will you and they have the decency, the honour, to try to contact me in person and ask for my side of the story? And if you and they cannot for some reason do that - or do not wish to do that - will you and they be silent, and give me the benefit of the doubt?

Will you actively aid and assist the Zionists and their government of occupation? Or will you defy them by striving to think and behave in an Aryan way, making personal honour the basis for your personal judgement about people, and indeed the basis of your life?

The choice is yours, and our very future, our very freedom, as a race depends on your choice.

David Myatt
111yf