An Introduction to National-Socialism
David Myatt
Preface
The purpose of this work is to provide a basic introduction to that 'world-view' or Weltanschauung which is known as National-Socialism and which Adolf Hitler created.
This introduction to a much maligned creed is written by a National-Socialist and as such will present National-Socialism as it actually is and not as it has been made to seem by the untruthful propaganda of its enemies.
In this present decadent age, National-Socialist views are heretical - and expression of them in many 'Western' countries which claim to be 'democratic' is illegal. The Governments of these, and other 'Western' countries, have imposed a tyrannical "political correctness" on their peoples by social and political legislation and policies: legislation and policies which, for instance, increasingly favour those non-European races who have settled and are settling in Western countries, and which make any vocal or written expression of European or Aryan racial pride and cultural awareness at best seem 'morally reprehensible' and at worst, an actual crime.
The revolutionary creed of National-Socialism challenges this
"political correctness" as it challenges both the
decadent(1)
Governments of all Western countries and those people who partake
in or encourage the decadence that infests all Western nations.
I Basic Creed
National-Socialism is a racial creed - that is, it is concerned with, and only with, a certain race (the Aryan or 'White' race), and it places race itself ( and the folk communities which compose the race) at the centre of things.
National-Socialism represents the soul or collective psyche of the Aryan - and it expresses, in a practical, realizable way, the Destiny of the Aryan race. National-Socialism affirms certain fundamental and inescapable truths regarding civilization and individuals. It affirms that civilization is a higher form of living - an evolutionary leap out of barbarism - as it affirms that for civilization to be created three things are necessary. These are creativity, heroism in the service of the folk or community, and the pursuit of (or struggle for) excellence. It affirms that for civilization to be maintained and expanded, the communities of the civilization must strive to uphold nobility and make nobility an ideal to be aspired to. Nobility is, in effect, a certain personal character - a noble person is someone who adheres to certain standards, or values/ideals: chief among which are honour, loyalty, and devotion to duty. By adhering to these, the person becomes distinguished by their behaviour and/or their exploits. The feature which underlies all these values or ideals is service by the noble individual to others or to a cause - that is, the individual is prepared to place others and/or their ideals before their own self interest.
Furthermore, National-Socialism affirms that of all the races which have evolved on this planet due to the workings of Nature, the Aryan has been shown to be the most creative and the most noble: that is, that the Aryan has been gifted by Nature with an ability to create and maintain civilizations over and above the ability of other races. National-Socialism makes conscious the Destiny of the Aryan, as, by its other affirmations, it makes conscious those factors which have (mostly instinctively) created and maintained civilizations in the past. This Destiny is fundamentally an awareness of the importance of the Aryan in creating and maintaining civilization, as well as an understanding that it is possible for us to evolve even further, even higher - to create higher, more noble, civilizations and thus create even higher beings: to take our race to the pinnacle of evolution.
Thus, National-Socialism asserts that for this present
civilization to be maintained and expanded, and for future,
higher, civilizations to be created, the Aryan must be preserved
and improved - and that racially-aware Aryan folk-communities
must be created dedicated to upholding nobility and pursuing
excellence.
National-Socialism makes the individual Aryan aware of these things - that is, it gives the individual an understanding of their own lives in the context of their racial heritage and their future potential. According to National-Socialism, the individual member of the race is not an isolated being - they belong to their folk, and this belonging means that all individuals have certain duties and responsibilities if they are to fulfil the potential which is latent within them and which is bequeathed to them by their ancestors. These duties and responsibilities are to those things which are beyond them as individuals - to their family, their folk-community, to the race and ultimately to what has made the race itself possible and given it the gifts it possesses (and which thus are given in varying degrees to the individuals of that race). What is beyond the race is Nature itself - those processes or forces which shape evolution, and which our ancestors called 'the gods'.
National-Socialism asserts that the goal for each individual is a noble one - that is, that the purpose of individual existence is not solely to achieve a certain material well-being, 'happiness' or pleasure; neither is it to strive to obtain a personal 'redemption' and thus a place in some sort of 'heaven' after death. National-Socialism sees such aims as these as selfish - decadent and uncivilized. The noble goal which National-Socialism gives to the individual is the fulfilment of their latent potential through the pursuit by the individual of excellence for the race itself. That is, the goal is to contribute to evolution in a positive way - to continue what evolution has wrought over millennia. This is achieved by individuals keeping their race pure (and thus producing descendants who are at the same high level of evolution and who can take it even higher) and by striving to live in a noble way according to their own talents and abilities - by striving, for instance, to achieve everlasting glory for themselves by doing heroic, noble deeds and thus aiding their folk-communities and the race itself, and/or working for the benefit of their folk: to improve the folk, aiding others to achieve their potential by, for instance, properly nurturing and farming the land, or inventing/discovering things.
This goal makes National-Socialism idealistic - that is, it reflects a desire for something better than, something beyond, selfish hedonism. It reflects the Aryan desire for a civilized way of life. It is a move upward - away from basic instincts, desires and greed. It is profoundly anti-materialistic. And yet it is realistic and in conformity to what exists - it reflects the laws of evolution, of Nature itself, as the many religions based on 'personal salvation' deny those laws and thus negate with their sentimentality and unprovable 'heavens', the potential of individual existence.
National-Socialism seeks to make this idealism real by re-organizing society and by creating folk-communities which uphold National-Socialist principles. In this, National-Socialism is a genuinely revolutionary movement, for it asserts that only by dismantling the old order, which is dedicated to selfish hedonism and/or multi-racial consumer materialism, can a New Order be built. This revolution involves a complete transformation in present-day ways of living and attitudes - and requires individuals to transform themselves by trading the decadence of the present for nobility and the pursuit of excellence. It requires standards of excellence, of beauty, of nobility to once again be accepted in all things - in everyday life just as much as in things like music, literature, art, architecture and drama. Furthermore, National-Socialism insists that these things - that this transformation of society toward noble idealism - can and will work. That is, National-Socialism affirms that we as Aryans have the ability, the will, the courage - the essential goodness - to make this New Order real: to actually build a better, more noble world for ourselves, our children and future generations. It really is only a question of whether we, in sufficient numbers, want this type of world strongly enough.
National-Socialism asserts that the present materially-centred order - as manifest in all 'Western' societies - is doomed because: (a) ultimately the pursuit of selfish hedonism leads to social dis-integration and chaos; (b) the egalitarian and multi-racial doctrines and policies being pursued by all 'democratic' societies undermine and destroy standards of excellence, nobility, and beauty, and thus lead to decadence; they also undermine, and destroy, personal character and thus leadership, placing dogmatic abstract ideas over and above the practical understanding gained by experience; (c) the racial inter-mixing that is occurring will assuredly lead to the downfall of the most creative and noble race, the Aryan, and thus the civilization the Aryan has created and maintained.
Before this downfall occurs, the tyranny which is evident, for
example, in the outlawing of certain political opinions and views
and in legislation designed to pacify the majority by dis-arming
them and making any effective effort by individuals to combat
things like criminal violence illegal - this tyranny will
increase. National-Socialism enables the yearnings of the
majority of Aryans for a better, more civilized world, to be made
real. The only alternative is a further decline back toward
barbarism and, ultimately, the downfall of civilization.
Naturally, the above is not how the majority of Aryans perceive National-Socialism. This is not surprising, given the intensity and virulence of anti National-Socialist propaganda over the past seventy years. Some of the oft-repeated lies about National-Socialism are dealt with in Appendix I.
II The Making of a National-Socialist
A National-Socialist is someone who not only upholds or supports the creed of National-Socialism, but who also applies the principles and ideals of National-Socialism in their everyday life. Being a National-Socialist means striving to live in a National-Socialist way. For the individual, this means championing those values which are central to National-Socialism - that is, loyalty, honour, duty.
Every National-Socialists commits themselves, without reservation, to these values. The duty of a National-Socialist is to fight for and on behalf of their race: to participate in the struggle to bring about a National-Socialist revolution. A National-Socialist gives their loyalty to their Comrades, their leader if they have sworn loyalty to him, and to the Cause of National-Socialism itself. A National-Socialist is obliged by their honour to strive to act in a noble way - to be loyal, to do their duty and to uphold the noble idealism of National-Socialism and thus civilization itself. These values, and this commitment, mean that each and every National-Socialist possesses or strives to possess, a certain character - and it is this personal character which is the hall-mark of a genuine National-Socialist.
Of course, this commitment is not easy - as these values are often difficult to uphold, particularly in a decadent world. But what is vitally important, is that the idealism behind this commitment and these values not only exists but is aspired to, for only by striving to possess this ideal, to make it real in the lives of individuals, can what is really good and noble survive and flourish.
A National-Socialist will not compromise with the decadence of the modern world, for they see and understand that decadence as being symptomatic of decay and disease: as being unhealthy and ignoble. Decadence is fundamentally a decline in or a loss of, excellence. Excellence itself is what is supreme, what is worthy - that is, what is worth-while, of quality; beyond the transient and the mundane. Excellence is the setting of high standards and the pursuit of them - a striving for what is ideal or archetypal. Excellence implies improvement - a moving forward to a higher level set by the ideal or the archetype. It is thus evolutionary - contributing to existence by upward development. What is worthy, for the individual, is what is noble - what is civilized: that which adds in a positive way to evolutionary development. What is not worthy is what is transient, what is de-evolutionary: what is ignoble, uncivilized.
Decadence is the abandonment of standards and a
levelling-down. It is the pursuit of the common in place of the
striving to reach a higher level. Decadence is the wallowing in
the transient. But perhaps most of all, on the individual level,
decadence is lack of real character. Decadence elevates
cleverness, 'education' and intellectual pretension over and
above experience, courage and heroism. Decadence elevates
self-indulgence above self-discipline. Decadence denigrates duty,
honour and loyalty. Decadence affirms those things which those of
weak character espouse - pacifism, peace, equality, 'harmony',
inter-racial 'love'. Decadence is materialistic - it mocks
idealism, the numinous, and the profound, and in place of
the aesthetic of beauty, it champions the ugly and the banal.
Decadence is, fundamentally, a manifestation of what is weak,
shallow, pretentious and vain. It is the philosophy, and the
aesthetics, of the coward.
All the societies of the West are infected with decadence as they are infested with decadents who, sadly, belong to and who disgrace the Aryan race. This decadence is evident in modern 'music', in modern 'art', in modern 'literature' - and in the slovenly, un-disciplined, dis-honourable loutish specimens who infest the cities , the towns and even rural areas. It is evident in the empty, arrogant, selfish, ill-disciplined hedonistic behaviour that has become prevalent, particularly in the young. It is evident in the growing use of 'drugs' and in the desire of individuals to first and foremost "have a good time" with no thought given to concepts like honour, duty and loyalty - or whether their behaviour is befitting for members of the most creative and noble race on earth. Decadence is evident in the lack of racial pride, in a lack even of racial awareness - in the deriding of the achievements of our ancestors. It is particularly evident in the encouragement and sympathy given to other cultures and other races.
All these things are symptoms of weakness - of a decline in vigour, of a loss of contact with the collective psyche or soul of the race. They are signs of a decline in civilization because they are contradictions of what is essential to civilization - that is, civilized behaviour and a civilized outlook. Civilized behaviour means honour, loyalty and duty; a civilized outlook is one which transcends the merely personal (if only instinctively) - it is the appreciation, by individuals, that they are part of something beyond themselves (their folk and the civilization it has created and maintained). It is an understanding (again, often instinctive) that they have a role in - and a responsibility toward - the upkeep of their folk and its civilization.
National-Socialism makes this behaviour and this outlook conscious - that is, it makes us consciously and fully aware of what civilization means and entails for us as members of a civilization. In this, National-Socialism is a step forward in our understanding of the world and ourselves - it enshrines, in its creed, the wisdom of thousands of years of civilization. Hence, a National-Socialist is someone who embodies in a practical way this wisdom - someone who by their actions and their style of life is positively contributing to civilization and evolution itself.
National-Socialism makes us, as individuals, aware of our duties and responsibilities, as it gives us an outlook which is civilized. We have a responsibility to uphold honour, loyalty and do our duty to our race, our civilization and, ultimately, ourselves - for only by being responsible in this way can we fulfil the potential that is latent within us. A civilized outlook is one which accepts the responsibilities civilization imposes - and a part of this outlook is the understanding of the importance of race ( and the folk-communities that make up the race) in the creation and maintenance of civilization.
But National-Socialism does much more than this - it shows us how it is possible to extend ourselves and civilization itself, to a higher level. It gives us the practical means whereby we can create higher, more noble, beings, fulfil our own potential, and create ever greater, ever higher civilizations in the future.
Every National-Socialist is a committed individual. They are committed to striving to uphold those values which make civilization possible and which positively contribute to evolution. They are committed to making others aware of what civilization involves, of the importance of race, individual character, and the pursuit of excellence. They are committed to the struggle to change the decadent System of the present and replace it with a revolutionary New Order. They are committed to what is positive, vigourous, and life-enhancing.
Such commitment is real, and means a National-Socialist is prepared, if necessary, to die to further the Cause - to uphold those values and those standards which are vital to National-Socialism and thus civilization itself.
It has to be emphasized that being a National-Socialist involves this commitment and this striving to uphold honour, loyalty and duty. Anything else is unsatisfactory - and no one has any right to call or describe themselves as a National-Socialist unless they are prepared to live their lives in a committed way and uphold those noble values. A National-Socialist, by virtue of what National-Socialism is, represents civilization itself.
Of course, mere followers or supporters of the creed of National-Socialism are not expected to make this commitment and undertake such a striving. But a National-Socialist must because, fundamentally, National-Socialism means the creation of a new type of person: someone who embodies in real life what is best in our race and civilization, who expresses in their living, our unique racial psyche, and who understands and knows and accepts the importance of race, of excellence, of individual character. Such a person fulfils, or can fulfill, the unique and great potential of our race.
A National-Socialist sets high standards of behaviour and
achievement for themselves because these high standards make
National-Socialism real. Anything less is not National-Socialism.
For example, a National-Socialist, committed to honour, loyalty
and duty, would not undertake any action which is dis-honourable
or ignoble - even if by such an action they sincerely believed
they might advance the Cause itself. But such a belief would be,
and always is, wrong. To undertake such an act or action - or do
anything which contradicted the noble principles of
National-Socialism - is self-defeating in the end since such acts
cannot advance the Cause because they undermine and ultimately
destroy what is being fought for: nobility, honour, loyalty and
duty. One can never further something by implementing its
opposite.
It is unfortunate that since 1945 many individuals have falsely called or described themselves as 'National-Socialists' without really understanding what National-Socialism is and what being a National-Socialist implies. Many of these individuals have been decadent specimens who had little or no understanding of honour and even less of loyalty and duty. Their actions and their behaviour have sullied and tarnished still further the image of National-Socialism. Such individuals have, sometimes, in the name of National-Socialism, committed dis-honourable, ignoble and cowardly acts, as they have, quite often, compromised themselves with decadence by, for instance, accepting and condoning modern 'popular music' and adopting slovenly dress. Quite often, these individuals have little or no real self-discipline and sometimes resort to cowardly attacks on members of other races. They are often disloyal - because it is easy - and happily spread rumours and lies about other Comrades, as they are seldom if ever prepared to accept authority.
It has to be repeated that such individuals are not, and never have been, genuine National-Socialists - they have merely used the name of National-Socialism for their own decadent and/or ignoble ends. It has to be further stressed that it is by their personal behaviour, by their actions, that genuine National-Socialists are known. Any ignoble, dis-honourable, cowardly or treacherous act cannot be a National-Socialist one - and anyone inclined toward such acts is not wanted in the National-Socialist movement.
There cannot be, and will not be, any compromise over this as
there cannot be any compromise with the forces of decadence.
III The Spirituality of National-Socialism
In a very important sense, National-Socialism is profoundly spiritual. 'Spiritual', correctly defined, means concerned with the soul or psyche: the fundamental concern of National-Socialism is with the Aryan and the collective psyche (or racial spirit/racial soul) of the Aryan. The concern of National-Socialism goes beyond the merely material - with creating a particular type of government and a materially prosperous way of life to ensure social and economic justice for all Aryans - since National-Socialism expresses the fundamental truth that material prosperity, without spiritual depth, without perspective, is meaningless.
Where National-Socialism parts company with other non-material creeds and philosophies is in affirming and insisting that genuine spiritual health can only come from what is life-enhancing, practical and real. All other presently-existing non-material creeds and philosophies fundamentally deal in abstractions, and the dogma and faith needed by 'believers', just as they concern themselves with the 'salvation' of the individual in isolation - they posit some kind of "heaven", some kind of "nirvana" where those individuals who have sufficient belief or "been saved" or pleased their god or been "compassionate/meek" enough will go after death. They also posit various types of "hell" where unbelievers will spend eternity (although some posit a cycle of re-birth until individual 'salvation' is attained). Fundamentally, all these creeds, philosophies and religions are ego-centric - they postulate that the meaning of life, for each individual, is 'salvation' and an 'after-life', usually in a heaven. All of them, in varying degrees, deal in "sin" - with making people feel guilty about various things, usually connected with the pleasures or beauties of life itself. All of them have some god, or some being, who is supreme - omnipotent.
In contrast, National-Socialism affirms that the purpose of individual existence is not some kind of selfish 'personal salvation' but rather the perfection of life itself by individuals striving to contribute positively to evolution. Further, it states that this striving enhances the life of the individual so striving. For National-Socialism, this perfection is continuing the work of Nature - Nature has produced, over millennia, race and the sub-divisions therein. It has evolved folk-communities, bound by a common psyche and an instinctive sense of Destiny, and produced from them civilization itself. The perfecting of life therefore lies in preserving, and expanding upward through the quest for excellence, race itself (2).
Furthermore, this perfection and this striving - and only this - maintains the natural balance of Nature itself. It is derived from, and is in harmony with, what is really and practically beyond us as individuals - the laws, forces or processes of Nature. That is, it is a genuine conscious expression of what actually is real, what exists - as the abstractions and dogma of conventional religions and non-material creeds are unreal, untrue, mere speculation and belief.
Because of this, the spirituality of National-Socialism is healthy, invigorating, joyful - in many ways it re-expresses, in a more conscious way, the attitude that lay behind the noble civilization of ancient Greece. It is a healthy spirituality because it respects the laws, processes or forces of Nature - because it works in harmony with evolution, and not against it, as all ego-centric, moralizing religions and creeds work against evolution and Nature by ultimately denying life itself and by denying its value and thus denying individuals the opportunities to go beyond what they are at any one moment.
The fundamental error of all ego-centric doctrines, religious or otherwise, is the arrogant presumption that Nature or evolution has been - or can be - overcome, or 'conquered': that mere dogma and belief have somehow 'freed' us from the laws, processes or forces of Nature; that it is possible, by implementing abstract social, religious or even political ideas, to somehow change or "rise above" those laws, processes or forces. This arrogant presumption - common, for instance, to Christianity, Marxism and liberalism - derives from a distinct lack of insight, a distinct lack of wisdom. It is indicative of the characterless 'cleverness' that has come to dominate the modern world - a 'cleverness', almost totally detached from reality, which projects abstract ideas (like the dogma of 'racial equality') onto reality and then interprets reality through the distortion of those abstractions: a pretentious 'cleverness' which mistakes this projection and this imposed distortion as "understanding". This 'cleverness' and this false 'understanding' gives rise, in those affected by it, to a smugness - a feeling of being "enlightened" with a disdain for those considered "unenlightened" or "uneducated" whereas, in reality, the "uneducated" are those not yet affected - or too sensible to be affected - by believing the abstract nonsense of the "enlightened" ones, be those "enlightened" ones those who have had some kind of religious 'revelation', been 'saved', or succumbed/been converted to an abstract, political dogma.
In reality, Nature will, over time, take revenge upon those who ignore, in whatever way, her laws. The arrogant ones, or their descendants, or both, will pay in one way or another. Those who ignore the laws of race, for instance, will bring retribution in the shape of social decay, disorder, decadence, ignoble deeds perpetrated upon the innocent, tyranny, poverty(3) - a slide back into barbarism and the ending of civilization. There is no way this can be escaped from - it is fated, the result of natural forces. It cannot be escaped from by sentimental ideas, by trying to implement abstract dogmas totally at variance with reality, by 'education', by spending vast sums of money, just as a volcano which is ready to erupt cannot be prevented from erupting however much some people may want it to stop or believe it can be stopped. Nature is stronger, more powerful and more inexorable than any hope, any dogma, any belief.
The ancient Greeks, in their wisdom, understood this - and
made this understanding conscious for the first time in human
history. The Greek drama of Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides
expressed this wisdom - this understanding that mortals are not
and never can be the master of Nature (or 'the gods' as they
expressed it)(4).
Indeed, the whole of Greek religion, properly understood - and
thus the whole of Greek society - was infused with this wisdom,
this understanding that there are limits or bounds to mortal
behaviour. To go beyond these was unwise, and invited the
retribution of the gods - the gods who made their civilization,
their society possible. The health, the prosperity of a community
just as much as that of an individual, could be taken away by the
gods - for it was the gods who had granted those things in the
first place: such things as civilization were gifts, and had to
be respected. Respect implied obligations, duties and
responsibilities. These were to the gods themselves, and to the
folk and thus the community. Thus a harmony was striven for - a
balance. The numinous, the sacred, was respected - thus
was health and vitality obtained and preserved.
National-Socialism expresses this ancient wisdom - and makes it more conscious. It adds to this wisdom, providing us with a means by which life can be lived as it should be lived - fully, with vitality, joy and fulfilling the promise of our potential. National-Socialism is this practical, natural and balanced approach to living. It expresses the wisdom of the Aryan psyche when it affirms that we, as individuals, live on after death not in some 'heaven' or 'hell' but in our deeds, in our achievements, our glory, and in our descendants to whom we pass on the promise of the race. It affirms this Aryan psyche when it denounces belief in a personal and selfish 'after-life' as unnatural, an affront to Nature, a chimera - as something detrimental to evolution and thus civilization.
In effect, National-Socialism makes conscious our natural, healthy and instinctive apprehension of Nature or 'the gods'. And it does this in a way which is practical - which enables us to realize our potential, to contribute to evolution itself. For Aryans, any other expression - any other creed or spirituality - is unhealthy and counter-productive: against our nature. Those who understand this have understood what National-Socialism really means.
IV Social Justice
The spirituality, the noble idealism, of National-Socialism is fine - but to become real for the majority it is necessary to be practical: to create the right social conditions for the implementation and development of such things.
It is a fact of human nature that someone who is starving, or homeless or forced by circumstances beyond their control to live without hope in poverty in a squalid environment will have little or no time for idealism or cultural and spiritual matters. Therefore, National-Socialism, being a practical expression of the wisdom of civilization, gives a high priority to social justice - to ensuring that the majority of folk in National-Socialist communities have gainful employment, a reasonable material standard of living and a healthy and satisfactory environment in which to live.
This means aiming to provide full employment, eliminating poverty, homelessness and unjust working conditions, providing excellent health care and improving social conditions - such as housing and environment. It means striving for a just and fair society in which all members are aware of the 'common good'. It means an end to exploitation, and the creation of a new economic system which places the welfare of the people first, and which puts an end to the system of international financial capitalism where profits, 'market forces' and personal greed come before the interests of the folk.
However, this quest for social justice extends only to the Aryan. National-Socialism is concerned with, and only with, the social welfare and spirituality of Aryan communities. Its care and its concern are for the Aryan - not for any other race. National-Socialism seeks to create racial States, communities or 'nations' which are exclusively Aryan - that is, it seeks the complete geographical separation of the races as the only way to real and lasting harmony and as the only way by which the civilization of the Aryan may flourish and the Aryan race itself be uplifted to fulfill its potential. Only such separation will enable Aryans to live in an Aryan culture devoted to Aryan ideals. Only such separation will enable Aryans to live healthy, natural, spiritual lives - to express by their living their unique soul or psyche. Only such separation will enable the creation of a socially just society which benefits Aryans.
National-Socialism is not interested in other races - in their social or political conditions. It is not interested, for example, in whether or not some foreign country inhabited by non-Aryans is stricken by famine. The care, the compassion, the love shown by National-Socialism is reserved for the Aryan and the Aryan alone. In this present age of abstract, multi-cultural sentimentality, this appears hard, as indeed it is. It is a statement of the reality of life and civilization. The sentimentality of multi-culturism - where advanced or 'developed nations' are supposed to have or take some responsibility to improve the conditions of other, less advanced 'nations' (often at the expense of the folk in the 'developed nations') - this sentimentality is a weakness, a symptom of decadence. By giving in to such sentimentality, future problems of a dire nature are created - chief among which is the collapse of the instinctive will to survive and flourish of the Aryan peoples of the advanced nations and thus their downfall through miscegenation as well as the destruction of the civilization created and maintained by the blood, toil and self-sacrifice of their ancestors. Furthermore, this sentimentality leads to a gradual breakdown of the advanced societies because it fosters a liberal attitude and a liberal approach to 'social problems' - the multi-racial compassion of the moment has contributed to the dire social decline evident in all Western or 'advanced' societies. This decline is manifest in the tolerance of ever-increasing, ever more violent crime; in worsening poverty and increasing homelessness. It is manifest in the despair of the unemployed, in the appalling wastelands of urban areas. It is manifest in the encouragement and aid given to "racial minorities". It is manifest in the calls for 'tolerance'; in the encouragement given to homosexuality. But perhaps most of all it is manifest in the belief that all differences (in ability, talent and character) can in the end be eliminated through compassion and programmes of social and political change - that given enough time, enough resources, enough 'aid', enough 'compassion' and 'understanding', any "under-developed nation" or any race, any coward or any criminal, can "make good", be changed, somehow acquire those qualities (like creativity, nobility, heroism) that hitherto were lacking.
This is the sentimental "victim syndrome" - and it a consequence of the abstract dogma of egalitarianism that all the governments and all the political parties of all Western nations support and adhere to. It is the belief, for instance, that other races have not produced civilizations because they have been 'victims' - of things like 'racism'. It is the belief, for instance, that the actions of a cowardly criminal, convicted of mass killings, can be 'explained' by their social background - their childhood, their 'trauma' at an early age, their lack of parental love. These beliefs are sentimental for two reasons. First, they shift the focus from what is real - the lack of ability, the criminal act of mass killing - to what is abstract and unreal: an idea about the causes of these things. Second, they project onto groups or individuals false hopes: that given a chance such groups or individuals are really no different, inside: they have been made what they are by circumstances, not Nature. In effect, this syndrome is another variant on the "we have/can conquer/change Nature" theme.
This sentimentality about other races and about Nature is a sign of a real lack of maturity - of a childish approach to problems and reality. A child may wish to believe that, for instance, a lion is just a large, cuddly cat - but any reasonable adult knows that a lion is or can be a ruthless killer by nature: that is, it is in the nature of lions that they kill. It is in the nature of civilizations that once the creative folk who have created and maintained a civilization give in to childish sentimentality (and Christianity is fundamentally a childish sentimentality) then those folk are weak, easy prey for those predators who wish to feast on the wealth and benefits of the civilization.
National-Socialism expresses a mature outlook when it says that the sentimentality that is evident in the modern world regarding other races and other cultures is dangerous - a sign of weakness. It expresses a mature outlook when it says that the only way to overcome this weakness - and its consequences (one of which is the decline and eventual destruction of this civilization) - is to place the interests of the Aryan first: to be concerned first and foremost for our own folk by separating the races and then, within a pure Aryan racial community, create a society for those Aryans which is socially just, and which will thus enable the members of that society to fulfill their full potential by partaking in what, being spiritual, is uplifting and which contributes to evolution.
Furthermore, this National-Socialist attitude is mature because it does not patronize other races: it allows them to develope in their own way, according to their nature and abilities. In effect, it restores to them the freedom and dignity which has been lacking ever since interfering, patronizing 'missionaries' of the Christian kind (and the international financial capitalists who went after them) saught to interfere in the lives of other races, mostly to the detriment of those other races. For a long time, the so-called 'humanitarian aid' and/or the loans the governments of the West have given have more often than not been used to increase 'Western' influence in and put pressure on the countries receiving such aid or loans - where by 'Western' is meant the decadent material-consumerism fostered by the international financial capitalist System.
National-Socialism aims to use the material wealth of Aryan countries to aid the Aryan - to build better, more socially just, societies for Aryans to live in.
.
V The Future National-Socialist State
The present practical aim of National-Socialism is to create an Aryan homeland, for Aryans only, wherein Aryan culture can flourish and wherein Aryans can live freely according to their own laws. This can be achieved in two ways, one of which, at this moment in time, is more feasible than the other.
Firstly, it could be achieved by a National-Socialist movement gaining political power in an already existing country - by National-Socialists taking over the government of a Western State and implementing a National-Socialist revolution in that State. This - despite the anti-Aryan tyranny of the moment, the anti National-Socialist laws and the incessant hostile propaganda - is still possible, although it would require the emergence of another leader with the genius, the ability, the courage and the charisma of Adolf Hitler. Secondly, it could be achieved by the creation of a small Aryan folk-community or communities, within, on the fringes of or external to, a modern State, Western or otherwise. This folk-community or collection of communities, would seek to live in an authentic Aryan way - to regulate its own affairs, run its own Schools and system of health care, and foster a sense of Aryan pride and Destiny. Children would be brought-up in a healthy, National-Socialist way as adults would strive to live by National-Socialist values. One model for the creation of such a community would be the self-sufficient English village of medieval times where the inhabitants in the main husband the soil and produce most other things by the skill and labour of their hands.
The essential features of this second way are first, its smallness; second, its feasibility at this moment in time, and third, its promise. (1): The smallness of such communities, and their rural setting, means that they are no direct, overt threat to the present System particularly if (a) the setting is sufficiently remote or isolated and at present uninhabited or sparsely populated and (b) such communities were to be established on the basis that their primary concern is with the community and the land inhabited by that community, with their way of life, with something spiritual - and not with 'politics'. (2): This way is feasible, now. It requires only a small number of individuals dedicated enough to settle an area and who are prepared to undertake the hard work necessary. It requires only the establishment of a National-Socialist association whose aim is to buy the necessary land, and whose members realize that certain material sacrifices will have to be made - perhaps for many years while the community becomes established: homes built, land cultivated. It requires only the re-emergence of that pioneering spirit that created most Western nations in the first place. (3): The promise of this way is great. As the decadent System decays toward collapse, such communities will preserve all that is needed for a large-scale Aryan resurgence, chief among which are the spirit of such folk-communities (the bond of hardship shared, for example) and the awareness of Aryan Destiny - the keeping alive of the Aryan soul and Aryan dreams. But, equally, such communities will produce, by their very National-Socialist nature, fine specimens of the Aryan race who, when the time is right, can emerge to lead other Aryans elsewhere to an awareness of their Destiny. It has to be remembered that civilizations are created by, led by and more often than not maintained by, small numbers of individuals of the right character who possess a sense of Destiny. What happens in the world external to such National-Socialist folk-communities is fundamentally irrelevant - their concern is for and only for those of the community, with building and maintaining that community and living an Aryan life. Such communities would be guardians of our Destiny - aware that their time will come with the fall of the old order, and that as long as they live in a National-Socialist way, keeping their blood pure, building character in their children, then they or their descendants will someday create a National-Socialist State and a civilization far greater than any hitherto.
Both of these ways produce a National-Socialist State, although in different ways, and therefore it is necessary to describe what a National-State actually is, and what a future National-Socialist State would do.
Fundamentally, a National-Socialist State exists to implement National-Socialism - to protect the Aryans who are members of that State, to create the right social conditions, to raise its citizens to a higher level. In brief, to maintain Aryan culture and civilization - and to further that culture and civilization by creating higher, more noble individuals. The initial concern of such a State is primarily inward - toward the people of that State. Only after National-Socialism has been implemented by a National-Socialist revolution will such a State of necessity turn its attentions outward.
However, it is a mistake to consider a National-Socialist State as some sort of 'war-machine' dedicated to the conquest of other States or peoples - this is neither necessary nor desirable. The real Destiny of a future National-Socialist State lies in the conquest of that final frontier - Outer Space. The dynamism, the quest for excellence, the nobility, the martial spirit which National-Socialism exemplifies will be fulfilled by this conquest and this conquest alone - for this conquest enables the Aryan for the first time in mortal evolution to consciously create not just a new civilization but a myriad of civilizations by seeding our race across the star-systems of the galaxy. Compared to this, squabbling over patches of land on this insignificant planet in our remote solar system is irrelevant - an insult to the greatness which we Aryans possess.
The aim of a future National-Socialist State is not some petty Empire on Earth - doomed as all such earthly Empires have been and are, to decline and fall - but a galactic Empire, an Empire created and maintained by the Aryan virtues of heroism, nobility and exploration, and made possible by the Aryan creative genius. For this aim and only this aim will allow the development of a higher race - it alone in the greatness of its challenge possesses the power to create such a race. It and it alone is worthy of our blood. This challenge of the conquest of Outer Space - the creation of an Aryan galactic Empire - is our unique Destiny as Aryans. The whole history of civilizations, from Sumeria through Greece and Rome to our own Thorian civilization(5), has led to this - has made this Empire possible. Our civilization, with its Science and its Technology, can make this Destiny real - and this Destiny for the first time enables us to free ourselves from the Earth: to expand into the infinite regions of the galaxy, to continue to grow, to settle, to expand, to change ourselves and our race. If we Aryans do not take advantage of this opportunity, it will never arise again. This present civilization will continue with its decline, petty squabbles will continue and increase, our race will concern itself with trivia, become extinct through miscegenation, and future civilization will be impossible. The promise of our mortal existence - the promise that lies in the star-systems of the galaxy - will be unfulfilled. Only the inspiration of the Aryan conquest of this final frontier of Outer Space can motivate us to true and eternal greatness; everything else - all other dreams, schemes, plans and desires - is petty and unworthy beside this. If we want to be great, we must dream great dreams - we must aspire to greatness.
However, for this Destiny to become real, a National-Socialist State must be created, for only National-Socialism can create the right conditions to enable us to venture out to colonize other worlds - only National-Socialism, with its spirituality, its practicality, its affirmation of what is noble, honourable and heroic, can produce individuals of the right character with the right motivation. Only National-Socialism can harness the idealism of our people to make this Destiny real because only National-Socialism represents this idealism - all other creeds, political forms, philosophies or religions set their sights lower, on what is banal: they are either concerned with abstract, dogmatic and materialist ideas (such as 'happiness and equality of the greatest number') or they deal in a selfish, personal salvation and mythical realms beyond death.
In contrast to such creeds, forms, philosophies and religions,
National-Socialism sets its sights as high as possible - through
social justice, through idealism, through affirming character and
race, through accepting the quest for excellence,
National-Socialism seeks to raise the Aryan to the pinnacle of
evolution: to create a new, higher type of mortal being. Being a
practical expression of what is real (such as the
forces of Nature), National-Socialism can actually achieve this.
Because of this aim, this Destiny, a future National-Socialist State would not concern itself with petty military or colonial adventures on this world - because such things are and would be petty and of no benefit. They would divert resources and man-power from what is fundamentally important - the creation of a prosperous National-Socialist State, the social improvements within such a State, and the scientific, technical and military schemes which would be necessary to build and man Space-Stations, colonies on the Moon and Mars, and which would eventually build Spaceships to take us out toward the stars.
Of course, a future National-Socialist State would ensure that it was more than capable of defending itself from anyone on this Earth who saught to attack it, as it would defend itself, if attacked - but it would not seek such conflict because its leaders would understand the wisdom of not allowing itself to get embroiled in wasteful, earthly conflict. The squabbles of other nations, other races would be of no interest whatsoever since the concern of a National-Socialist State is with its own people and their advancement through achieving their Destiny.
The National-Socialist State would welcome other Aryans committed to its ideals as it would seek to be an example to other nations and States with an Aryan majority still clinging to the decadent forms of the old material order - showing them what is possible when Aryans work together in the service of a noble cause. It is possible that, given time, a federation of Aryan States or nations would evolve, all of whom co-operated with another for the greater Aryan good. The National-Socialist State would also seek to obtain whatever it needed, in the way of raw materials or other resources possessed by other countries, by negotiation and trade since this is the wise and civilized way to achieve such things - a way consistent with the aims of National-Socialism in the 21st Century and beyond; that is, consistent with its singular concern for the Aryan and the achievement of that Aryan Destiny which is a galactic, extra-terrestrial, Empire.
In its internal structures, the National-Socialist State would implement the leadership principle and seek to ensure responsibility and power were not abused. It would seek to train and elevate to positions of leadership and thus responsibility, those with the right character - that is, those who lived or saught to live their lives by those fundamental principles of National-Socialism: honour, duty and loyalty. Such leaders would seek to be honourable in all their dealings, as they would do their duty to their folk by placing the interests of the folk first; they would be loyal to the idealism of National-Socialism and to those leaders who embodied that idealism.
In effect, the National-Socialist State would embody and make real the conscious understanding and the wisdom gained from thousands of years of civilization - the society created by such a State would be a noble one, aware of its heritage and its Destiny. The people of that society would be encouraged to live healthy, joyful, honourable lives and to work for the benefit of the society as a whole. The structures of such a society - such as Schools - would aim first and foremost to produce individuals of character who embodied noble idealism, who eagerly saught to do their duty and who aspired to fulfill the Destiny of their race by being heroic, by questing for excellence, by discovering and exploring and by working the soil in a way consistent with Nature.
This future National-Socialist State is not a wistful unrealizable dream. It can be made real, despite the difficulties which National-Socialists face in this decadent age and despite the vile, lying propaganda campaign against National-Socialism which has been virulently conducted for nearly seventy years and which has brain-washed the majority of Aryans into believing National-Socialism is other than it is.
This State can be made real for three simple reasons. (1): The
old order is decaying - nothing can save it: certainly not the
propaganda and the lies of the lackeys of this decadent System.
It is decaying and will surely die because it is based on
falsehoods, on trying to implement ignoble, abstract and dogmatic
ideas which ignore the workings of Nature. Nature will revenge
herself upon the arrogant upstarts and their descendants. Her
revenge will be bloody, painful and full of suffering. (2): Only
National-Socialism embodies the noble idealism which the majority
of Aryans possess in their hearts - it provides the only
practical, noble, alternative to the present decadence and to
future decay and decline. It can restore to us our noble dreams -
our aspirations and our hopes. It can give us the tools we need
to create a better world for ourselves and our descendants. It
and it alone can lead us to a healthy, more spiritual way of
life. All National-Socialists need to do is (a) have the courage
to explain this - to counter the lying propaganda of this
decadent age regarding National-Socialism, past and present - and
(b) to live in a National-Socialist way, embodying in their
own lives those fundamental principles of National-Socialism:
honour, loyalty and duty. (3): National-Socialists embody
all that is best about our race, and provided they keep alive the
Destiny of the Aryan and the truths of National-Socialism, they
will assuredly be there when their leadership, their knowledge
and their skills will be needed by other Aryans - when the rotten
System lurches toward its inevitable collapse. As the decadence
and decline increase, as National-Socialists stand firm against
this decadence and decline - as they and National-Socialism are
seen for what they really are - so too will more and more Aryans
be drawn toward the noble National-Socialist cause until finally
a great movement will arise to build a New Order from the ruins
of the old.
Appendix I - Some Lies About National-Socialism Exposed
Because of the intensity and virulence of anti
National-Socialist propaganda over the past seventy years or so,
it is necessary to briefly counter the most oft-repeated lies.
Lie: The German National-Socialists exterminated
millions of Jews during the Second World War as a result of their
policy of genocide.
Truth: The method alleged to have been used for the
majority of these 'exterminations' - gas-chambers using the
chemical Zyklon B - is scientifically impossible. [See
"The Leuchter Report"(6)]
There was no policy of extermination, by National-Socialists,
against other races - that is atrocity propaganda, produced in
the War, and maintained ever since because it aided those who
saught to discredit and destroy National-Socialism. [ See, for
example, "The Truth About National-Socialism and Adolf
Hitler" (Thormynd Press, 1994) ] Of the many books dealing
with this propaganda - this lie of mass exterminations - see, for
example, Butz - "Hoax of the Twentieth Century";
Barbara Kulaszka (editor) - "Did Six Million Really
Die?"; Carlos Porter - "Not Guilty at Nuremberg";
Joseph Harlow - "Innocent in Dachau".
Lie: Hitler was responsible for the Second World War.
Truth: The War was actually agitated for by Hitler's
opponents from the moment he achieved power in 1933 because he
was a threat to their plans [ see "The Truth About
National-Socialism and Adolf Hitler"]. The Second World War
was, in fact, a War forced upon Hitler by Britain and America and
Hitler's opponents - as has been scholarly shown by David L.
Hoggan in his book "The Forced War". [See also H.E.
Barnes - "Blasting the Historical Blackout". Hitler's
Speech of 4th April 1939 in answer to Roosevelt - "An
Exchange of Communications Between the President of the United
States and the Chancellor of Germany. David Irving -
"Churchill's War."]
Lie: National-Socialist Germany was a ruthless, brutal
dictatorship where the Gestapo routinely tortured people.
Truth: National-Socialist Germany abolished the pretence of 'parliamentary democracy' where professional politicians and parties represented every interest except Aryan ones. They replaced it with the leadership principle - and those leaders were expected to be honourable and to work in the service of the people. It was, in fact, the re-creation of the type of ethos that existed in ancient Greece in the Athenian polis. Hitler was the supreme leader - and he was invested with his authority by the vast majority of the German people. He was responsible to them. He used the trust they gave him to create a better, more noble society for them - by restoring their pride, giving them hope, better social conditions, more employment and so on. They respected him and loved him because of this - he was immensely popular. He was frugal in his personal life, and never once abused the power he had.
The picture of National-Socialist Germany as a 'terror State'
is a lie ceaselessly propagated by those - like Communists and
Zionists - who had reason enough to hate Adolf Hitler and what he
had achieved because he was a threat to their plans. The same
applies to the myth of the Gestapo torturing people - it is
propaganda, which reached its height during and immediately after
the Second World War. Unlike the anti-German atrocity propaganda
produced during the First World War - which was repudiated as
propaganda after the end of that war, it having served its
purpose of stirring up anti-German feeling - the atrocity
propaganda produced before and during the Second World War has
gone on because it still serves a purpose: it aids those who did
have and who have a vested interest in destroying
National-Socialism. [ See "The Truth About
National-Socialism and Adolf Hitler";
"National-Socialism - Principles and Ideals".]
The following works give a further insight into what National-Socialism actually is and what National-Socialist Germany represented:
* The Truth About National-Socialism and Adolf Hitler. ( Thormynd Press, 1994)
* National-Socialism: Principles and Ideals. (Thormynd Press, 1993)
* National Socialism - Vanguard of the Future (Nordland Forlag, Denmark. 1993)
Appendix II - The Discernment of Wisdom
Ancient Greek literature, and particularly Greek Tragedy, expresses a wisdom that the majority of people, in this decadent age, have either forgotten or choose in their pursuit of hedonism, to ignore. What is expressed, for example, in the 'Oedipus Tyrannus' of Sophocles, is something vital, something that even after two thousand years has relevance to our lives.
However, this literature has been made to seem - by the various translations that have appeared over the past hundred years or so - rather boring. It has also suffered from modern pretentious abstract 'interpretations' which at best distort its real meaning and at worst, totally obscure it.
Consider, for instance, the 'Oedipus Tyrannus' - or 'Oedipus the King' as it is often rendered. For most of those who have heard of this drama by Sophocles - as for the majority who have actually read it in one of the usually appalling modern translations - the central theme is the incest of Oedipus with his mother, Jocasta, and the killing of his father. In the majority of the 'interpretations' of this drama, these are viewed morally - and this is particularly true of the incest. Thus, the drama is seen as some kind of 'moral' tale, of the kind once fashionable for children. It is also interpreted psychologically - as a study of the supposed 'hidden' psychology of Oedipus - and thus used to provide 'evidence' to support an abstract psychoanalytical theory. Quite often, in these decadent days, the drama is "updated" - set in a modern context using modern language and metaphors - when presented either in translation or performance.
This disposable "updating", these moral and psychological interpretations are not only incorrect, they also completely miss the meaning of the tragedy. The essence of this particular drama lies in the realm of the gods - the incest by Oedipus, his killing of his father, are merely incidents. It was in the realm of character that Oedipus failed. Oedipus was certain of himself - he had skill [did he not solve the riddle of the Sphinx?]; he had power [was he not King of Thebes?]; he had strength and courage [did he not by his own hands kill many men when he was attacked?(verses 801ff) ]. All these things, in relation to the power of the gods, mean nothing - as Creon says to Oedipus at the very end of the drama: "Do not desire to be master in all things, for you are without the strength which assisted you in life."(7) The gods have taken away his strength, and his power - and he is, at the end of the drama, a blind broken man: someone who will, as the blind prophet Tiresias predicted earlier in the drama, "As a beggar, who before was rich, he shall go to strange lands with a stick to guide him ..."
But the real tragedy lies in the fact that Oedipus was not an impious man - he was not condemned by the gods because he slept with his mother and killed his father: he tried to avoid doing both. Rather, as the Chorus say in another Sophoclean drama: "Mortals cannot be delivered from what is ill-fated by destiny." (8) Oedipus committed "hubris" - insolence toward the gods. Oedipus was certain - and wanted to know who his mother and father were: "I cannot be persuaded not to learn of this for certain" he says at one point.
The crux of this drama - and of all Greek tragedy, properly understood - lies in the relation of the individual to their community and the gods. The Oedipus Tyrannus describes one such relationship which leads to personal misfortune. Toward the end, the Chorus say:"You generations of mortals - I count your zest as equivalent to nothing, for who is the man who wins more from a fortunate divinity than just that outwardness of fame which later sets?" Oedipus had the appearance of good fortune - power, wealth, skill - but it was only appearance, as Oedipus later realizes: "I, the beauty that you reared, had bad wounds festering underneath!" (v.1395-6)
The drama thus explores, and explains, the truths concerning the gods and how these affect mortals. There is no moral, abstract, judgement - but rather an explanation of the workings of 'Nature', the cosmos and mortal existence itself. The Greek drama of Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides express the wisdom of the Greek civilization itself - they represent fundamental truths, fundamental insights, which the Greeks were the first to express. Unfortunately, these truths, these insights - this wisdom - have been covered up and obscured over the centuries by the moralizing dogma of Christianity, by the abstract ideas of liberal-marxist materialists and by the pretentious cleverness of characterless modern pseudo-intellectuals.
The most fundamental truth is the concept of 'hubris' - of the relation of the individual, and the community, to the gods. This does not mean that Greek drama dealt with religion as we have come to understand 'religion' thanks to centuries of Christian influence and indoctrination. That is, this wisdom is not concerned with ideas of sin, guilt, the performance of services, prayers for forgiveness, personal salvation and an attitude of meek reverence toward an omnipotent deity.(Some crass translations of Greek drama actually project such Christian values and concepts onto the Greek!) Rather, this drama expresses a certain attitude to life and living - a pagan one. There is an enjoyment of life, a celebration of beauty - definitely no guilt attached to certain things. But there is also an awareness of the limits of personal and communal behaviour - there is an understanding, often unspoken, of how mortals are balanced between their families, their communities and their gods. The health, the good fortune of the individual, the family and the community depends on maintaining that balance - on respecting what belonged to the gods. To upset this balance was 'hubris', insolence - this was when the individual, or the family or the community, saught to appropriate to themselves what rightly belonged to the gods. [ We might say, in a simplistic sense, 'upset the balance of Nature'.] This insolence invoked the fury of the gods - the Furies themselves: "But powerful is the power of Destiny - she cannot be escaped from by wealth, by war, by ramparts, by taking ship upon a black storming sea." (Antigone, v.952f.)
In Greek society, the individual had duties - to their family, their community and their gods. One of these duties was to quest for excellence: to achieve an honourable fame by courage and valour, for one's self, one's family and one's community, for such fame honoured the gods; another duty was loyalty - thus, it was considered disloyal, and cowardly, to forgive someone who had offended the family. The offence had to avenged - or just compensation obtained from the offender Such notions held sway in the Greek world for centuries (qv. Theophrastus' "Characters", written after Aristotle's time) and they expressed the essence of what the Greeks regarded as civilized behaviour. The thread which runs throughout Greek civilization is this quest for excellence - the quest for honourable fame through courage and valour. This quest made civilized character - it vitalized individuals, the family and the community, and ennobled them. It made the Greeks what they were - civilized and able to express, in drama or poetry, the wisdom of their civilization: to make this instinct for civilization and civilized behaviour conscious for the first time in human history.
These duties expressed the balance between the individual, the family, the community and the gods. To upset this balance was uncivilized - it invited retribution, vengeance by the gods, upon the individual, the family and the community. These duties - and the civilization that was based upon them - were founded on a strong sense of identity, of belonging: they extended only to those who 'belonged', who were regarded as kin-folk. For instance, the polis of Athens was a small community of citizens who shared the same descent - that is, blood. They were racially exclusive - granting privileges, and rights, only to their own kind: outsiders were tolerated, but excluded from interfering in the affairs or administration of the polis.
The quest for excellence describes another distinctive trait of the Greek civilization - the belief that is was through struggle, through adversity, hardship and competition, that a person's character was revealed. Battle, for instance, would reveal if a man was a coward - if he was, he was regarded as being unfit for any public office. Indeed, it was accepted that before a person could take part in public and civic life, he had to have shown courage and valour in battle - for by these things he gained the respect of his fellow citizens and of the gods themselves.
This whole attitude to living, expressed so eloquently in Greek literature from Homer to Theophrastus and beyond, is a natural one based on the pursuit of excellence and a pagan understanding of life. It is an attitude, however, that has become foreign to most Aryans today despite the fact that it represents the natural and instinctive ethos of those of European race. It is foreign to most because of the moralizing, abstract dogmas and ideas which have come to dominate European consciousness partly due to centuries of Christianity and partly due to the more recent imposition of materialist liberal-marxism with its unnatural and insolent egalitarian 'socialism'.
Most Europeans by their acceptance of such moralizing abstractions and dogmas, deny their heritage - a heritage of which ancient Greece is an integral part. Indeed, it is a part which explicated the real soul or psyche of the European or Aryan for the first time.
In an important sense, the modern Western world and its peoples have lost that balance which Greek drama expresses so poignantly. They have committed - or will commit - hubris; they are disrespectful toward the gods - toward the laws, forces and processes of Nature, as is so evident in the many acts of miscegenation. For miscegenation is the undoing of what Nature - or the gods themselves - have achieved over millennia. The Nemesis that is to come cannot be avoided - but what brings about this retribution can be understood and expressed and used to restore that balance, that way of living, which brought forth not only the Greek civilization but also this present one. This understanding has been expressed before - in Greek literature, and a proper appreciation of this part of our heritage can aid others to re-discover our natural, healthy and civilizing ethos.
Furthermore, this literature expresses and affirms what
National-Socialism expresses and affirms. For National-Socialism
enshrines those fundamental truths, the wisdom, which made the
ancient Greeks what they were. Those who do not understand this
have neither understood ancient Greece nor National-Socialism
itself.
Footnotes
1. What is meant by 'decadence' is fully explained in the text; briefly - decadence is the decline in, or loss of, excellence.
2. It should be obvious that miscegenation - the destruction of race and racial difference - is the undoing of what Nature has created and is therefore de-evolutionary: a journey backwards.
3. These problems are increasingly affecting Western societies.
5. This is the correct way to describe the present civilization founded in Western Europe and which is heir to the civilization of Greece and Rome. The ethos of this civilization is Thorian - from Thor, the Norse god. A less accurate description is 'Faustian'.
6. This - and other works mentioned herein - can be obtained from addresses given at the end of this Appendix.
7. The Oedipus Tyrannus of Sophocles - Translated by DW Myatt