Recently, I was sent a copy of an article that appeared in a national newspaper here in the UK following the racially-motivated riots in Oldham. The article - typical of the many which were written about the racial problems in Oldham and elsewhere - spews out all the old liberal-Marxist myths and prejudices against racial nationalism and racial nationalist organizations.
For instance, in respect of those who join such organizations: "Tribal hostility is rooted in fear and insecurity. Racial extremism recruits the poor, the uneducated and hopeless..." And: "It's the people who have the least emotional resilience, and who therefore feel most insecure, who are most likely to be receptive to racist extremism..."
Furthermore, there is, of course, the continued use of the
modern sociological words "racist" and "racism"
with the author of the article seeking to find "the
roots of this white racism..."
These liberal-Marxist myths and irrational prejudices were much in evidence a year ago following the trial of National-Socialist Movement member David Copeland who, tired of the multi-racial society, saught in his own way to do something about it by planting bombs in London which killed three people and injured scores of others.
Thus, David Copeland was described as an insecure, unstable,
individual, who was easily influenced. (See, for example, the
book Mr Evil: The Secret Life of Racist Bomber David Copeland.)
What the newspaper article mentioned above and the book about
David Copeland show is an arrogant prejudice: a bias, a
preconceived (and irrational) opinion against racial nationalism,
and those who uphold it, be they nationalists or
National-Socialists. This arrogant, irrational, prejudice is rife
among journalists, politicians, Police Officers and those charged
with making and administering "the law". And it
is this irrational prejudice which is largely responsible for the
society we have today.
Correctly understood, racial nationalism - the desire to create and live in an ethnic homeland or nation among one's own kith and kin according to the laws and customs of one's ancestral culture - is a more natural, more harmonious, more healthy way of life than the drug-infested, crime-ridden, multi-racial society which we are forced to live in today. And forced to live in because the Government of the day, all the Governments of the past five decades, and all the main political Parties, have made and enforce tyrannical laws to create a particular type of society.
All these tyrannical laws - and the society and Institutions
of today - are based upon liberal-Marxist-sociological myths and
prejudices regarding racial nationalism: the myth of tribal
hostility; the myth of lack of intelligence and lack of
education; the myth of insecurity; and the myth of racism.
The Myth of Tribal Hostility:
The root of racial nationalism is tribal awareness. Tribal awareness - or more correctly, ethnic, or folk, awareness - arises from a sense of belonging; from identifying with a certain local area (smaller than the modern nation of Britain) and identifying with the people who inhabit that area, who all share a common racial ancestry and a common culture. It could be said that a tribal or folk community is a community of blood relatives and relations.
In a very real sense, there is a natural feeling of belonging in such a community. This feeling of belonging has its roots in a wordless, often numinous, appreciation of Nature born from living and working for year upon year in one area. Thus does the place of one's dwelling become understood as the home of one's ancestors. There is a continuity, often going back centuries or more.
This belonging is strengthened by a mutual overcoming of
difficulties and problems: of natural disasters; poor harvests;
perhaps a clanning together to defend the land from invaders. In
particular, it is strengthened by hard toil, by working on the
land, or by one's own hands, year after year, decade after
decade, with this toil being shared among a community and among a
collection of communities.
I myself know and have felt this sense of belonging. Over
three decades ago, I wandered over the land of my ancestors: the
land which for well over a thousand years had been the home of
the people with whom I share a common racial ancestry, a common
ethnic culture: Angles, Saxons, Vikings, Celts. All these were
North European tribes, and all had, before the introduction of
Christianity, a common world-outlook, evident for example in the
Norse Sagas, the story of Beowulf, the Welsh legends, and in the
type of law which governed the communities of these people.
I remember walking along a dusty road in Yorkshire one warm and sunny day in Spring, stopping briefly to rest on a village green before partaking of a pint of ale in the village pub. I remember the friendly conversations with the people, there, and the feeling of though being a wandering, young, stranger, of still belonging to their world, their way of life. I remember a hot evening one Summer while near the Essex coast and on my way to Suffolk, falling asleep in a field not far from the sea having drunk rather a lot of cider, and being found in the morning - unable for a moment to remember where I was - by farmworkers one of whom gave me some tea made from water boiled in a Kelly kettle.
I remember walking one windy, rain-swept Autumn day along a lane among the hills of Northumberland where a dog was chained on a long chain by the side of the road, miles from any human habitation, with only a kennel for shelter, and, miles of walking later, meeting a farmer, and spending a pleasant hour or so talking as the clouds fastly skudded past to break and reveal a brief but still warm sun.
I remember the beauty of a woman's face - her smile, her scent - as she opened the door I had knocked upon one cold and snowy winter's evening to ask for water. I remember the warmth of the house that seeped out to me standing there in my father's old but still perfectly warm Greatcoat. I remember her kindness, the noise of her young children, playing inside, and how the woman's face, her scent, haunted me for hours afterwards until I fell asleep, huddled up against the cold.
I remember the many people of many ages, many occupations - men and women, old and young - who gave me lifts in their cars, vans and lorries as I hitched along the roads and lanes of my land. I remember listening to their views, their stories, their dreams - and sometimes their problems.
I remember many things... Mostly good. But most of all I remember feeling a common, unspoken, bond with the people, the very land itself. Not a romantic, unreal, type of thing: but something tangible and true, as if most of the people I met were distant cousins, or relatives, or forgotten school-boy friends; as if I myself was grown from the very land, from the hills of Northumberland, from the fertile fields of Essex, from the oak trees that bordered a high stream in Derbyshire, from the very rocks of a crag in Yorkshire. Often, with people, there was no need for words; or for too many words. I, we, understood with a look, a gesture, a smile.
This sense of belonging - drawn from the land and the people -
creates, or can create, a real harmony: a harmony based upon the
community way of living which once existed in this and other
North European nations, and which made those nations decent
civilized places to live.
What is particularly important, is that this sense of
belonging can create an entirely new type of society where there
is a harmonious, healthy, natural, civilized, way of life. And it
is such a new type of ethnic, or folk, society which racial
nationalists seek to create.
Quite naturally, this folk awareness, this tribal awareness, implies and means a determination to keep one's identity, one's culture, one's homeland, one's roots. Its implies and means that we place our own culture, our own homeland, our own people first; that we are proud of our land, our culture, our traditions, our people. That we do not want to see them destroyed.
But these things are being, and have been destroyed, by our modern multi-racial societies. Britain is not the place it was, only thirty years ago. Already North Europeans are a minority in the city of Birmingham, as they will be a minority in the rest of Britain in less than a hundred years time. Our culture, our way of life, our land, our identity and even our people are being destroyed.
Such things as an ethnic society are natural, and healthy. Why should we have to live in a multi-racial society? What should we who are of North European descent have to accept more and more immigrants into what once were our own homelands? Why cannot we have our own society, our own homeland, for our people? Those who have settled here, and who continue to settle here, still have their own homelands, inhabited almost exclusively by their own people and home to their own culture, but we North Europeans, we Aryans, are not allowed to have a land of our own, a culture of our own, political organizations of our own.
What we Aryans are being asked -and indeed told - to do is
utterly unnatural. We are being asked to devote ourselves to the
interests of other
races, other cultures, and to ignore the interests of our own
race, our own culture. This is similar to asking a man to forsake
his own children and love the children of his neighbours, since
to do otherwise would be "tribal hostility" and
"racial extremism" and of course "racial
prejudice". And thanks to over fifty years of
liberal-Marxist-sociological indoctrination in Schools, in the
Media and elsewhere, we all "know" that racial
extremism is based upon fear and insecurity.
In fact, the truth is that an awareness of racial diversity and difference - and desire to preserve and strengthen one's own racial identity and culture through racial nationalism - is based upon a healthy, natural, sense of belonging: and in particular on the inner strength which such a sense of belonging provides. (So much for the liberal myth of insecurity.) Often, this inner strength is manifest in that wordless pride which our forebearers knew, and in that stoic defiance of Fate and odds, which lie at the heart of many of our ancestral legends, stories, and songs.
But, thanks to the liberal-Marxist-sociological prejudices of
our time, things have gone so far in our multi-racial societies
that hardly any Aryan, any White person, knows what their own
Aryan culture is: for our ancestral legends, stories, sagas and
songs are hardly ever taught, recalled and sung.
The Myths of Lack of Intelligence and Lack of Education:
Quite often, the people who put forward, who espouse, these particular myths are simply prejudiced against what used to be called "the working class".
It is a fact that many ordinary working-class people are involved in, or support, racial nationalist organizations. It is also a fact that some of these people have few if any so-called "academic qualifications". But this does not make such people un-intelligent, or un-educated in the correct sense of the term (to educate: to train morally and mentally).
To say or belief otherwise is not only wrong, it is also patronizing, hypocritical and prejudiced, especially when voiced by some so-called Marxist, Labourite or crypto-Marxist.
I remember, several decades ago, reading a statement in a newspaper by some student-age "anti-nazi" regarding me and a racial nationalist organization I myself was involved with. This person was, on his own admission, involved with some Marxist organization or other, and yet he maintained that most of the young people involved in the racial nationalist organization were just "thick apprentice types": that is, he considered them un-educated, working-class lads. He himself, of course, though a Marxist (and thus in theory a supporter of "the workers" ) was middle-class and had never done a day of manual labour in his life.
Has the Journalist who wrote the newspaper article I was sent ever spent any time with ordinary working-class people (some of whom might just belong to or support a racial nationalist organization)? Has this person - and the many, many similar persons - ever done any hard manual work? Ever worked for months at a time with such people?
I myself have worked on farms, in factories, on building sites, and I know from my own personal experience that many ordinary working-class people can solve practical (and not so practical) problems that would fox some with "academic qualifications". I also know from practical experience the real comradeship which developes when you do hard manual work with the same so-called "uneducated" working-class people day after day, month after month, year after year. There really is a firm, understated, never talked about, bond of friendship formed from sharing hard manual work, which I also know is very different from the kind of relationship which forms when one works in an office or does some kind of non-manual work.
Sadly, not only if this kind of work dying out, but so are the people who do it and the communities where they live: replaced as they have been and are being by denizens of the consumer-social-worker society.
In many ways it is correct to say that the manual workers, the toilers - those who worked with their hands - formed the essence, the very foundation, of our nation, expressing as they did in their very being the values, the hopes, which created this nation and which maintained it for so long. These were the men - and the women - with a spirit as stout as oak; these were the men, and the women, as generous and giving, as the fertile lands of Essex, Suffolk and Kent; these were the men, and the women, as enduring as the hard rock of the Malvern and the Mendip hills.
So it no wonder than many of them still, in their hearts, their soul, their being, identify with a racial nationalist organization which seeks to express the very essence, the spirit, the being, of the land and culture of their ancestors who toiled, suffered and in many caused gave up their lives for the sake of England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland.
Uneducated? Lacking in intelligence? A description certainly
of the prejudiced and often hypocritical liberals and Marxists.
The Myth of Racism:
The terms "racism" and racist" are recent inventions. Racism itself is a modern abstract idea, a modern theory, invented by Marxist social engineers and used by those social engineers, and those who aid and support them and their social engineering, to mentally condition people and so enable those social engineers to construct the modern tyrannical, dishonourable, usury-driven, "politically-correct" crypto-Marxist multi-racial societies we have today.
The truth is that the nations of the West have been turned
into "politically-correct" societies because of the
political and social ideas invented by
these people and propagated for over seventy years by them and
their Marxist, their crypto-Marxist, and their liberal helpers.
These societies are
Marxist in all but outward name. In fact, there has been the
introduction of Marxism by stealth, by deceit, by social
engineering.
For the reality is that Marxism is not fundamentally about
opposing so-called capitalism: it is about creating a
mechanistic, soulless, tyrannical
multi-racial society governed by and upholding abstract
materialistic values and ideas where The State has supreme
authority and where such
Aryan ideals as personal honour and duty to the folk are at best
rejected and at worst unknown.
Whenever we hear or see the words racism and racist we are hearing and seeing crypto-Marxist social engineering at work. The ideas of the sociological theory of so-called racism, and the term racist, are a means of social control: a means to tame, to control, to subvert, to dominate.
In a modern State like Britain, the Police and the Security Service, MI5, are used to enforce the tyrannical, politically-correct, crypto-Marxist status quo: seeking out, and tracking down, people who are suspected of being "racist" and indulging in all kinds of covert surveillance in an effort to enforce the multitude of tyrannical laws which have been introduced. To enforce such a political tyranny, the Police have been given more and more powers just as more and more laws restricting what we can say or do have been introduced. Indeed, "fighting racism" has become a priority for the Police and the Government of the day: by which they mean fighting anyone who opposes the politically-correct multi-racial status quo and especially those, like racial nationalists, who seek to create an ethnic homeland for their people.
What is "racism?" It is any opposition by
Aryans ("Whites") to social and political policies of
racial preference for non-Aryans ("non-Whites"). It is
any preference by Aryans for their own people and culture. It is
any resistance by Aryans to becoming a minority race in what once
were their own nations. It is any defiance: any unwillingness to
let non-Aryans insult you and your people. It is any
unwillingness to let more and more non-Aryans crowd into what is
already a vastly overcrowded nation. It is, in brief, any of the
healthy and natural aspirations of a people that have created and
maintained folk societies and nations since recorded history
began.
David Myatt
JD2452067.235